Teams

TIA: Deuces Wild

2024 18&Over Women · 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-15vs TCH: Backhand BanditsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeena Evers / Rachelle Spielvogel vs Melinda Chiavaro / Kimberley Hortopan6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole DiMartino vs Marci Ponagai6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnna Julien / Trista Huang vs Georgie Kovacs / Debra Rothschild4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-10vs Sleepy Hollow: Sleep and RallyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Medrano / Yuliya Charamnykh vs Aileen Huvane / Meghan Murnane6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmi Song / Meena Evers vs Caitlin Scheir / Meghan Boland6-2, 6-3
2024-07-01vs Tarrycrest Swim and Tennis 2.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMeena Evers / Rachelle Spielvogel vs Andrea Gottschall / Christina Clarke6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesNicole DiMartino vs Carolyn Oppenheim4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTrista Huang / Jocelyn Zoland vs Sara Parganos / Paula Ferreira5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesAmi Song / Meena Evers vs Sarah Garcia / Olivia Donovan6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNicole DiMartino vs Prudence Fisher6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesIris Kao / Hafiza Gujaran vs Elly Roman / Krista Friedrich6-0, 6-2
2024-06-10vs Ardsley CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Medrano / Yuliya Charamnykh vs Janet Krzemienski / Terry Bloch6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmi Song / Hafiza Gujaran vs Elizabeth Organ / Kimberly Hogan6-1, 6-1
2024-06-07vs Amackassin Club 2.5ersWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmi Song / Julie Medrano vs Meghan Donohue / Michele DelGiudice6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTrista Huang vs Christine Celli6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Zoland / Iris Kao vs Noelle DelGiudice / Kathy McKeon6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesAmi Song / Julie Medrano vs Caitlin Chang / Leah VanDeloo6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNicole DiMartino vs Karen Arnett5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKomal Jhaveri / Iris Kao vs Martine Broeders / Mila Burns1-6, 1-6
2024-05-13vs Club Fit Briarcliff:Tuf Luv LiteWon 21
W#1 DoublesYuliya Charamnykh / Julie Medrano vs Jacqueline Brabants / Leslie Hershey6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesHafiza Gujaran vs Pooja Purewal2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeena Evers / Ami Song vs Ratna Bindra / Cathryn Devons6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAmi Song / Meena Evers vs Ellen Brower / Elissa Nycz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHafiza Gujaran vs Carla Zambri6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Medrano / Komal Jhaveri vs Betty Brady / Stacey Cesarski6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hafiza Gujaran
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.64
Ami Song
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.58
Meena Evers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Iris Kao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
Rachelle Spielvogel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Jocelyn Zoland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Anna Julien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Nicole DiMartino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.00
Komal Jhaveri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Medrano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Trista Huang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Yuliya Charamnykh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ami Song + Meena Evers4455% games−5.9% vs expected
Yuliya Charamnykh + Julie Medrano4255% gamesnot enough data
Yuliya Charamnykh + Ami Song5067% gamesnot enough data
Rachelle Spielvogel + Meena Evers224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Medrano + Ami Song303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hafiza Gujaran
15W–10L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ami Song
27W–18L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Meena Evers
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Iris Kao
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Rachelle Spielvogel
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.34
Jocelyn Zoland
26W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Anna Julien
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nicole DiMartino
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Komal Jhaveri
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Julie Medrano
17W–11L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trista Huang
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yuliya Charamnykh
21W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.