Teams

FTA55A/Cardinal/Haigler

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - FTA - Nights and Weekend · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jackie Walker
published
3.33
Sara Mower
published
3.24
Christine Cole
published 3.5
3.21
Debbie Etherington
published 3.5
3.17
Dawn Haigler
published 3.5
3.10
Catherine Mazza
published 3.5
3.08
Cynthia Forbes
published 3.5
3.02
Susan Krzeminski
published
3.02
Nancy Lanois
published
2.99
Meng Sheridan
published
Mary Suski
published
Sommer Hammett
published
Windy Pruette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Etherington + Nancy Lanois1439% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Forbes + Jackie Walker3248% gamesnot enough data
Sara Mower + Susan Krzeminski224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Lanois + Susan Krzeminski224 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Etherington + Sara Mower303 matchesnot enough data
Meng Sheridan + Catherine Mazza123 matchesnot enough data
Sara Mower + Cynthia Forbes123 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Forbes + Susan Krzeminski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Walker
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Sara Mower
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Christine Cole
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Debbie Etherington
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Haigler
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Catherine Mazza
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cynthia Forbes
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.08
Susan Krzeminski
36W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Nancy Lanois
12W–24L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Meng Sheridan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Mary Suski
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sommer Hammett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Windy Pruette
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.