Teams

Mad Ants

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.69 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-16vs Four WhoaLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Pagan / Moise Zinsou vs Patrick Vaughan / Andre Taggart0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / Jim Leveque vs Andrew Aylward / Jeremy Maytum5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / Michael Hansberry vs Sadeep Moorthiyedath / James Smith6-3, 6-1
2021-06-14vs Cobra Kai 4.0 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / Bruce Knolmayer vs Jon Jensen / Jonathan Rivera3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Hansberry / Stephan Mulrain vs David Trang / Joseph Marino2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJoe Pagan vs Dharmesh Patel2-6, 2-6
2021-06-07vs The Bishoff's Gambit 4.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJim Leveque / Emad Nekoo vs Chuong Dang / Jeff Brainard2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Hansberry / Moise Zinsou vs Andrew Currie / David Porter2-6, 4-6
2021-06-06vs Over the Wall 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / Michael Jarman vs Sridhar Atluri / Lohiya Atluri6-2, 7-6
2021-05-20vs MVLee 4.0 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / Moise Zinsou vs Richard Spicer / Ricardo Green5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Hansberry / Rongfeng Li vs Michael Vanderputten / David Nazari0-6, 0-6
2021-05-15vs Killer Gerbil 4.0 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / Jim Leveque vs Wendell McKay / Edward Kwitowski1-6, 4-6
2021-05-13vs Over the Wall 4.0 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRongfeng Li / Rohit Marwaha vs Sridhar Atluri / Andy Blocker5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmad Nekoo / Jagannath Surampudi vs Robert Fox / Ken Brown6-7, 4-6
2021-05-11vs Cobra Kai 4.0 18+Lost 03
L#2 DoublesMichael Hansberry / Moise Zinsou vs David Trang / Vince Sbarra3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJoe Pagan vs Brian Shaw - (DQ)2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / Jim Leveque vs Jon Jensen / Amir Moinfar2-6, 0-6
2021-05-08vs Killer Gerbil 4.0 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSterling Elder / Joe Pagan vs KHOURY ZIAD / Steve Chan4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephan Mulrain / Jagannath Surampudi vs Nhat Ngo / James Wen3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Bryant / Rongfeng Li vs Mike Ziebarth / Ray Yep2-6, 1-6
2021-04-25vs Four WhoaWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Hansberry / Jagannath Surampudi vs Sanjay Jauhari / James Smith6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRongfeng Li / Jay Yee vs T Ashley Smoot / David Gong6-2, 6-0
2021-04-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBruce Knolmayer / Michael Lang vs Jeff Brainard / Matthew Carson1-6, 5-7
2021-04-16vs MVLee 4.0 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Bryant / Rongfeng Li vs Alexandre Fines / Bradley Jacques3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Jay Yee
published 4.5
3.64
Jim Leveque
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Daniel Bryant
published 3.5
3.35
Bruce Knolmayer
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Jagannath Surampudi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.18
Joe Pagan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Michael Hansberry
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Rongfeng Li
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
Justin Groenewold
published
Toru Matsubayashi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rongfeng Li + Michael Hansberry1432% gamesnot enough data
Rongfeng Li + Jagannath Surampudi314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Hansberry + Jagannath Surampudi303 matchesnot enough data
Jagannath Surampudi + Jim Leveque123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jay Yee
134W–66L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Jim Leveque
172W–202L career · 8 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Daniel Bryant
27W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Bruce Knolmayer
124W–136L career · 17 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Jagannath Surampudi
296W–330L career · 16 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Joe Pagan
29W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Michael Hansberry
109W–157L career · 11 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Rongfeng Li
120W–164L career · 13 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Justin Groenewold
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Toru Matsubayashi
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.