Teams

BASALT BLACK

2025 ITA MIXED - MOUNTAINS · MIXED 6.5 - ITA - MOUNTAINS

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-28vs GSCC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Yoko Smith Rhodes vs Brady Emens / David Joseph6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiana Ray / Zach Stuart vs Eric Strautman / Tierney White6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Cotton Koehler vs Shawn Lawrence / Carolyn Strautman1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-21vs GSCC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Yoko Smith Rhodes vs Anna Lorenson / Shawn Lawrence6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrooke Stott / Howard Roney vs Brady Emens / Robert Sanderson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJosh Pulliam / Lynsey Pulliam vs Steven Vidamour / Tierney White3-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs GSCC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Richlyn Pavcek vs Robert Sanderson / Anna Lorenson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesYoko Smith Rhodes / Rich Pavcek vs Brady Emens / Steven Vidamour6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLynsey Pulliam / Josh Pulliam vs David Joseph / Carolyn Strautman6-1, 6-3
2025-08-07vs GSCC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Daniel / Cotton Koehler vs Brady Emens / Shawn Lawrence7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Rich Pavcek vs Robert Sanderson / Susie Demers2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMattias Pitka / Tatum Rees vs Eric Strautman / Carolyn Strautman7-6, 6-2
2025-07-31vs GSCC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Diana Ray vs David Joseph / Susie Demers6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLynsey Pulliam / Josh Pulliam vs Eric Strautman / Carolyn Strautman6-0, 6-1
2025-07-24vs GSCC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Daniel / Howard Roney vs Brady Emens / David Joseph2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Rich Pavcek vs Robert Sanderson / Susie Demers6-7, 2-6
2025-07-17vs GSCC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Stott / Cotton Koehler vs Brady Emens / Shawn Lawrence1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMattias Pitka / Tatum Rees vs Ryan Scheidt / Susie Demers1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRichlyn Pavcek / Rich Pavcek vs Eric Strautman / Carolyn Strautman6-2, 6-2
2025-07-10vs GSCC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Yoko Smith Rhodes vs Brady Emens / David Joseph4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesZach Stuart / Diana Ray vs Tierney White / Steven Vidamour6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrooke Stott / Cotton Koehler vs Anna Lorenson / Robert Sanderson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED 6.5 - ITA - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BASALT BLACK7116820183
2GSCC GREEN1781636247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Tatum Rees
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Cotton Koehler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Marlin Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Rich Pavcek
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Zach Stuart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Josh Pulliam
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Yoko Smith Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Howard Roney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Amy Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Brooke Stott
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Diana Ray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Lynsey Pulliam
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Richlyn Pavcek
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Mattias Pitka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zach Stuart + Diana Ray6355% games+11.4% vs expected
Marlin Rhodes + Yoko Smith Rhodes4356% games+8.8% vs expected
Richlyn Pavcek + Rich Pavcek2642% games−2.5% vs expected
Lynsey Pulliam + Josh Pulliam5551% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tatum Rees
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Cotton Koehler
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Marlin Rhodes
25W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Rich Pavcek
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Zach Stuart
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Josh Pulliam
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Yoko Smith Rhodes
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Howard Roney
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Amy Daniel
30W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Brooke Stott
35W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Diana Ray
26W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lynsey Pulliam
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Richlyn Pavcek
20W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mattias Pitka
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.