Teams

4LIFE-MARAZZA 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 MEN SEM

2024 SEM TRI-LEVEL - AUGUST · D2 MEN TRI LEVEL 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 SEM

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesLuke Revello / Alessandro Ugo Marazza vs Praveen Kumar Konada / Vignesh Gouthaman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCesar Amendola / Kris Nestoroski vs AMANPREET SINGH / Madhup Singh6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDiego Loaiza / Carlos Ruiz vs PADMANABHA RAO CHUKKAPALLI / Bhargava Puli6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTyler Davis / Luke Revello vs Seth Kornfeld / Dorran Dihle7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCesar Amendola / Gilson Arima vs Timothy Arthur / Thomas Corner4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Rodzik / Massimo Fulfaro vs Draython Savoi / Brad Stieber2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAlessandro Ugo Marazza / Tyler Davis vs Alfredo Ospina / Sean Gordon2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCesar Amendola / Joseph Stutz vs Timothy Throgmorton / Blaine Borchardt4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Ruiz / Amit Newalkar vs Eric Griffin / Patrick Lee0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLuke Revello / Alessandro Ugo Marazza vs Joel Ewald / Eric Rymkiewicz6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKris Nestoroski / Gilson Arima vs Joshua Ewald / Jason Stadtherr3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiego Loaiza / Michael Rodzik vs Carl Hawkins / Peter Taylor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLuke Revello / Tyler Davis vs Michael Balagna / Emmett Shaw4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMassimo Fulfaro / Amit Newalkar vs Jesse Eron / Joshua Matz4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTyler Davis / Alessandro Ugo Marazza vs Praveen Kumar Konada / Madhu Dayananthan4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKris Nestoroski / Nicolas Marsheh vs Satyajeet Sahu / Kartik Pallavajhala6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiego Loaiza / Amit Newalkar vs Hamilton Parr / Karthik Thinnanur3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAlessandro Ugo Marazza / Tyler Davis vs Dae-Hee Kwak / Robert Hull4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJoseph Stutz / Nicolas Marsheh vs Jeremy Jeruzal / Shepard Peir Johnson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiego Loaiza / Massimo Fulfaro vs Mark Katakowski / David Pohl2-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesAlessandro Ugo Marazza / Luke Revello vs Joel Murav / Sean Gordon4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKris Nestoroski / Gilson Arima vs Blaine Borchardt / Jack Lord1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiego Loaiza / Massimo Fulfaro vs Bart Lowery / Beomseok Baig6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · D2 MEN TRI LEVEL 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11BT-CHUKKAPALLI 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 MEN SEM8021312166
26LIB-KORNFELD 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 MEN SEM6217717181
33DEER-ROSEN 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 MEN SEM6215918174
42CHIP-DEMOSS 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 MEN SEM3571734237
55WESS-EWALD 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 MEN SEM1751942277
64LIFE-MARAZZA 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 MEN SEM0871737263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Alessandro Ugo Marazza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Nicolas Marsheh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Kris Nestoroski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Cesar Amendola
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Luke Revello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Diego Loaiza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.15
Gilson Arima
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Massimo Fulfaro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Michael Rodzik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Amit Newalkar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joseph Stutz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicolas Marsheh + Cesar Amendola17066% games+9.3% vs expected
Cesar Amendola + Gilson Arima6452% games+1.8% vs expected
Luke Revello + Alessandro Ugo Marazza41047% games−5.1% vs expected
Cesar Amendola + Kris Nestoroski4259% gamesnot enough data
Nicolas Marsheh + Alessandro Ugo Marazza3251% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Stutz + Cesar Amendola224 matchesnot enough data
Amit Newalkar + Massimo Fulfaro224 matchesnot enough data
Kris Nestoroski + Alessandro Ugo Marazza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alessandro Ugo Marazza
38W–48L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Nicolas Marsheh
87W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Kris Nestoroski
56W–36L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Cesar Amendola
55W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Luke Revello
38W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
3
Diego Loaiza
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.28
Gilson Arima
24W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Massimo Fulfaro
11W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
Michael Rodzik
2W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.89
3
Amit Newalkar
20W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Joseph Stutz
73W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.