Teams

Huseman

2025 USTA Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-26vs AragonLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Huseman / Caroline Huseman vs Brian Otterness / Tessa Aragon1-6, 6-7
2025-08-12vs BounLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Permenter / Elizabeth Huseman vs Duain Gomez / Kimberly Mendosa2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWill Ritter / Julian Huseman vs Bounhieng Manhkong / Khin Lwin5-7, 3-6
2025-08-05vs AragonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Permenter / Caroline Huseman vs Brian Otterness / Claudia Aragon6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPhil Slaton / Kristi Mahoney vs Stephen Hargrove / Tessa Aragon6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCoby Marr / Julian Huseman vs David Blackwell / Melody Garrido6-2, 6-2
2025-07-22vs BounSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJason Permenter / Elizabeth Huseman vs Duain Gomez / Kimberly Mendosa6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhil Slaton / Kristi Mahoney vs Samuel Berryman / Jennifer Puentes4-6, 1-6
2025-07-15vs AragonWon 30
W#1 DoublesWill Ritter / Caroline Huseman vs Brian Otterness / Michele Fant6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCoby Marr / Elizabeth Huseman vs David Blackwell / Melody Garrido6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChad Huseman / Julian Huseman vs Carlos Aragon / Tessa Aragon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Julian Huseman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Caroline Huseman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Elizabeth Huseman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Will Ritter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Chad Huseman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Kaci Bohn
published
3.11
Coby Marr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jason Permenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Phil Slaton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julian Huseman + Chad Huseman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julian Huseman
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Caroline Huseman
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Elizabeth Huseman
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Will Ritter
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Chad Huseman
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kaci Bohn
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Coby Marr
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jason Permenter
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phil Slaton
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.