Teams

RCCB - Tattersall

2026 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-11vs Suntree - RezaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGarrett Preisser / Matthew McGuire vs Adrian Reza / Robert DeVries7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPaul Huss vs Carl Stephens6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesThomas Lasko / Richard Martin vs Jason Estes / Haynes Payne2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBill Stanley / Alexander Green vs Anthony Michaels / Vito Jimenez4-6, 2-6
2026-02-25vs Rockledge - TullochLost 04
L#1 DoublesGarrett Preisser / Matthew McGuire vs Steve Lutter / Bruce Brothers1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Huss vs Ernie Wong7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Lasko / Bill Stanley vs Mark Craig / Rodrigo Matias1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Martin / James Dovell vs Richard Carrillo / Andrew Toth2-6, 6-7
2026-02-18vs Brevard/RouveyrolLost 13
L#1 DoublesThomas Lasko / Kiko Dontchev vs Richard Lowe / Marcus Lumpkin2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGarrett Preisser vs David Stevens6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBill Stanley / Matthew McGuire vs Thomas Armstrong / Carl Acquaviva2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Martin / Phil Wakefield vs Phil Kurian / Robert Dunn1-6, 3-6
2026-02-11vs Kiwi - CruzSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPete Tattersall / Matthew McGuire vs Kevin Recker / Christopher Moore6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPaul Huss vs Daniel Richards6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJames Dovell / Bill Stanley vs Todd Christie / Mark Redmon3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGarrett Preisser / Phil Wakefield vs Tj Wyand / Tj Persicketti2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-04vs Suntree - RezaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPete Tattersall / Larry Hingle vs John Sheppard / Dominick Nitti2-4
W#1 SinglesPaul Huss vs Jason Estes7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBill Stanley / Matthew McGuire vs Leonardo Miotti / Ryan Wilkins2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Parsons / Kiko Dontchev vs Robert DeVries / Adrian Reza4-6, 2-6
2026-01-21vs Rockledge - TullochLost 04
L#1 DoublesPete Tattersall / Bill Stanley vs Steve Lutter / Alan Machado3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJames Dovell vs Ernie Wong2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Lasko / Larry Hingle vs Andrew Toth / Rodrigo Matias4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPhil Wakefield / David Parsons vs John Bailey / Richard Carrillo2-6, 3-6
2026-01-14vs Brevard/RouveyrolWon 31
L#1 DoublesDavid Parsons / Thomas Lasko vs Robert Dunn / David Stevens1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesPaul Huss vs Carlos Sanchez-Larios6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPete Tattersall / Kiko Dontchev vs Valtecio Segundo / Antonio Cedeno1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGarrett Preisser / Richard Martin vs Carl Acquaviva / Stephan Rouveyrol6-4, 6-1
2026-01-07vs Kiwi - CruzSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPete Tattersall / Matthew McGuire vs Patrick Carlson / Chris Warticki6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGarrett Preisser vs Tj Persicketti6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Lasko / Paul Huss vs Tj Wyand / Mark Redmon6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJames Dovell / Bill Stanley vs Kevin Recker / James Beitman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Paul Huss
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.90
Garrett Preisser
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.76
Richard Martin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Matthew McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Pete Tattersall
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Larry Hingle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Thomas Lasko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Kiko Dontchev
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
James Dovell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Phil Wakefield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
David Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.25
Bill Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pete Tattersall + Garrett Preisser3350% games+15.0% vs expected
Richard Martin + Pete Tattersall033 matchesnot enough data
Pete Tattersall + Larry Hingle123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Lasko + Larry Hingle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Huss
10W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.18
3
Garrett Preisser
19W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Richard Martin
1W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Matthew McGuire
3W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Pete Tattersall
16W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Larry Hingle
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Thomas Lasko
12W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
Kiko Dontchev
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
James Dovell
6W–20L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.48
Phil Wakefield
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
David Parsons
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40
3
Bill Stanley
0W–18L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.