Teams

CHABOT CANYON 18AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Srinika Narayan
published
3.65
Melina Meza
published
3.56
Kristina Lovato
published
3.44
Kech Carera
published
3.40
Debbie Chang
published 3.5
3.32
Jennifer Martinis
published
3.32
Patty Nunez
published
3.31
Vicki Wong
published
3.30
Christina Stearns
published 3.5
3.27
Patti Presto
published
3.21
Stacie Maa
published
3.19
Mindy Williams
published
3.16
Una Elias
published
3.15
Kathleen Maynard
published
3.11
Ariana Shaffer
published 3.5
2.97
Andrea Akel
published 3
2.90
Jessica Soltz Rudd
published
2.84
Jennifer Newens
published
2.79
Maryam Amini
published
2.64
Julie Wunderlich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Martinis + Debbie Chang4149% games−6.6% vs expected
Debbie Chang + Kech Carera2343% gamesnot enough data
Patty Nunez + Debbie Chang224 matchesnot enough data
Una Elias + Andrea Akel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Srinika Narayan
29W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Melina Meza
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.65
Kristina Lovato
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Kech Carera
54W–46L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Debbie Chang
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jennifer Martinis
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Patty Nunez
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Vicki Wong
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Christina Stearns
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Patti Presto
25W–29L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Stacie Maa
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Mindy Williams
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Una Elias
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Kathleen Maynard
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Ariana Shaffer
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Andrea Akel
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Jessica Soltz Rudd
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
Jennifer Newens
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.84
Maryam Amini
8W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Julie Wunderlich
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.