Teams

2.5 TCC Bland/Burleson

2026 Adult 18&over-NE · Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-12vs Jenna TrautmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesLogan Garner / Kristi Martin vs Jenna Trautman / Emma Geiger2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBrooke Burleson vs Corrie Weatherford6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKenzie Bland / Elizabeth Steen vs Morgan Lyons / Kim Bailey2-6, 3-6
2026-04-02vs Jenna TrautmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Burleson / Samantha Weatherford vs Emma Geiger / Heaven Day6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaty Riley / Miranda Conn vs Kim Bailey / Laura Orr6-3, 6-4
2026-03-29vs Jenna TrautmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesMiranda Conn / Samantha Weatherford vs Tedi Kennedy / Kim Bailey6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKaty Riley vs Emma Geiger2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKara Penny / Shannon Chrisman vs Jenna Trautman / Heaven Day0-6, 3-6
2026-03-05vs Jenna TrautmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesShannon Chrisman / Logan Garner vs Jenna Trautman / Corrie Weatherford2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMiranda Conn vs Heaven Day6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristi Martin / Elizabeth Steen vs Morgan Lyons / Emily Cagle6-2, 7-6
2026-02-22vs Jenna TrautmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMiranda Conn / Kara Penny vs Jenna Trautman / Heaven Day1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSamantha Weatherford vs Jenna Wiygul6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKenzie Bland / Shannon Chrisman vs Emma Geiger / Laura Orr0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12.5 TCC Bland/Burleson328716124
2Jenna Trautman237817117

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Miranda Conn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.46
Samantha Weatherford
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.09
Kenzie Bland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.09
Brooke Burleson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.02
Katy Riley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.96
Elizabeth Steen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.76
Shannon Chrisman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kara Penny
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Logan Garner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miranda Conn + Katy Riley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miranda Conn
19W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Samantha Weatherford
27W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Kenzie Bland
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Brooke Burleson
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Katy Riley
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Elizabeth Steen
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Shannon Chrisman
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
Kara Penny
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Logan Garner
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.