Teams

LA - Canyon Coyotes

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Men 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-02-25vs LA - LATCLost 01
L#1 SinglesKelly McMillen vs David Padua5-7, 2-6
2024-02-17vs LA - Ace DragonWon 10
W#1 SinglesKelly McMillen vs Timothy Karp2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-10vs LA - Queen Anne 3.5MWon 10
W#1 SinglesKelly McMillen vs Minh Pham2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly McMillen / Tyler Greene vs Evan Libaw / Tomer DeVito6-4, 6-2
2024-01-27vs LA-LLW-GC Ball Busters-Bob ShamesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly McMillen / Tyler Greene vs Morris Ruskin / Kevin Dill6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
George Hernandez
published
3.38
Kelly McMillen
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Tyler Greene
published
Anthony Tanner
published 3.5
Audie Leksunthon
published 3.5
3.23
Glen Chester
published
2.99
Richard Alziebler
published
2.96
Dennis Alfelor
published 3.5
2.93
Alvin Chong
published 3.5
Ed McCarthy
published
Everjohn Feliciano
published
Ezekiel Joubert
published
Jaron McDonnel
published
Theoda Sing
published
Tony Ngo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alvin Chong + Richard Alziebler0528% gamesnot enough data
Alvin Chong + Audie Leksunthon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

George Hernandez
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kelly McMillen
84W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
Tyler Greene
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Anthony Tanner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Audie Leksunthon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Glen Chester
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Richard Alziebler
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Dennis Alfelor
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.96
3.5
Alvin Chong
4W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Ed McCarthy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Everjohn Feliciano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ezekiel Joubert
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jaron McDonnel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Theoda Sing
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tony Ngo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.