Teams

ACAC Hollomon

2023 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-24vs TCRC Gibson SoloAcesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMajd Babik vs Judah Alter2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Robert Preservati6-3, 6-1
2023-08-22vs Woodlake UrbanWon 21
W#1 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Mikhil Sanduria6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJerry Cole vs Wieslaw Gumulak5-7, 6-7
W#3 SinglesJeff Bosch vs Gregory Terry7-5, 6-3
2023-08-10vs Burkwood SinsabaughLost 01
L#2 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs William Walton3-6, 1-6
2023-08-03vs MTC FusterLost 02
L#1 SinglesMajd Babik vs Robert Gilfillan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJerry Cole vs Sam Kang2-6, 5-7
2023-07-27vs Raintree KallamLost 12
W#1 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Bhargavaram Kallam6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJeff Bosch vs Ted Scherer4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesCliff Heller vs Theo Prestia6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-20vs Westwood RabhanWon 10
W#3 SinglesCliff Heller vs Sean DiBlasi6-4, 6-1
2023-07-17vs TCRC Gibson SoloAcesLost 02
L#1 SinglesJeff Bosch vs Judah Alter4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCliff Heller vs Jeremy Theisen1-6, 2-6
2023-07-14vs MAC BrodLost 02
L#1 SinglesMajd Babik vs Alex Neuwelt4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMichael Hollomon vs Dylan Brod5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jerry Cole
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.87
Miguel Romero
published
3.86
Majd Babik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jeff Bosch
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.67
Michael Hollomon
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.64
Cliff Heller
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majd Babik + Jeff Bosch4353% gamesnot enough data
Cliff Heller + Jeff Bosch224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerry Cole
165W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Miguel Romero
29W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Majd Babik
202W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Jeff Bosch
205W–177L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Michael Hollomon
97W–107L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Cliff Heller
148W–125L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.