Teams

Team 4 Honey Deuces

2024 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.92 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJEANETTE SARAIVA vs Courtney Culbreath5-7
2024-10-13vs Team 3 The AvengersLost 01
L#3 SinglesJoyce Aramburu vs Yurong Zhang3-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs Team 8 Full Court PressLost 02
L#2 SinglesJane Ignacio vs Jacqueline Corcoran3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJEANETTE SARAIVA vs Mary Tisch1-6, 0-6
2024-09-29vs Team 6 Net Jobs 3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJoyce Aramburu vs Estefania Torres0-6, 0-6
2024-09-22vs Team 1 Love & DeucesLost 01
L#1 SinglesJoyce Aramburu vs Linda Dinga2-6, 1-6
2024-09-13vs Team 2 Capital CrushLost 01
L#2 SinglesJoyce Aramburu vs Monica Popp1-6, 0-6
2024-09-07Lost 02
L#2 SinglesJEANETTE SARAIVA vs Wendan Sun1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Icore vs Wenxuan Tang7-6, 1-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Asma Shah
published 3
2.88
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.87
JEANETTE SARAIVA
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.52
Jane Ignacio
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.46
Joyce Aramburu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.34
Jacqueline Duarte
published
2.29
Sarah Icore
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Ignacio + Joyce Aramburu0520% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Aramburu + Lynnita Montague-Daddio134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Icore + Lynnita Montague-Daddio314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Asma Shah
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
108W–128L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
JEANETTE SARAIVA
65W–43L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Jane Ignacio
29W–88L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Joyce Aramburu
78W–180L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.46
Jacqueline Duarte
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Sarah Icore
46W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.