Teams

Serve It Up

2021 DC Adult 18 & Over Summer · Adult 18 & Over Men 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / WASHINGTON D.C.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-22vs PRO NATIONWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Tice / Phillip Harris vs Jeffrey Traigle / Joseph Celtnieks6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-15vs PRO NATIONLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhillip Harris / Richard McKeon vs Ted Kim / Anthony Rickert4-6, 3-3
2021-05-08vs PRO NATIONWon 10
W#3 DoublesPhillip Harris / Mark Hill vs John Hisnanick / Jeffrey Traigle7-5, 6-2
2021-05-01vs PRO NATIONLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Tice / John Sommer vs Joe Lartey / Sean Pruitt7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-24vs PRO NATIONSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPhillip Harris vs Jarett Parker5-7, 5-4
W#2 DoublesDaren Bakst / Richard McKeon vs Anthony Rickert / Michael Hammond6-3, 6-2
2021-04-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaren Bakst / Richard McKeon vs Reggie Hay / Chad Smith6-1, 6-2
2021-04-17vs PRO NATIONWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaren Bakst / Peter Tice vs Andrew Perkins / Joseph Celtnieks7-5, 6-3
2021-04-10vs PRO NATIONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Sommer / Richard McKeon vs Sean Pruitt / Michael Hammond6-7, 3-3
W#1 SinglesPhillip Harris vs Joe Lartey6-1, 3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
James Shevlin
published 3.5
2.87
John Sommer
published
2.80
Waldo Ford
published
Daren Bakst
published 3
Gifford Wong
published 3
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Phillip Harris
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carl Colin
published
Mark Hill
published
Peter Levine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Levine + Richard McKeon1533% games−6.1% vs expected
Peter Tice + Richard McKeon3355% gamesnot enough data
Phillip Harris + Peter Tice123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James Shevlin
25W–26L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
John Sommer
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
Waldo Ford
7W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Daren Bakst
15W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Gifford Wong
9W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63
Phillip Harris
12W–22L career · 5 lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 4 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.62
Carl Colin
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Hill
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Levine
9W–26L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.