Teams

Ma.Gonella18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Caroline Wright7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-19vs Mi.Lagerstedt18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Karen Southern6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAnn Garey vs Michelle Gessner2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-12vs Je.Komes18S3.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Teresa Ling6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Keshia Green6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-05vs Je.Williams18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Ellina Max5-7, 3-6
2023-06-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Bladen Leippe6-3, 6-4
2023-06-26vs Ka.King18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Karen Johnston7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Jennifer Kuzma2-6, 0-6
2023-06-23vs Mo.Sheets18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Leila Thomas1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-21vs Da.Rusnak18S3.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Julie Shuey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Dawn Rusnak6-0, 6-2
2023-05-31Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Mallory Altneu3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
3.09
Sarah Overholser
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Kari Knoblauch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.76
Kathryn Shields
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.67
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Shields + Kari Knoblauch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Ann Gonella
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Kari Knoblauch
113W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.