Teams

A: HH:Meltzer

2022 NH Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed Hybrid 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-15vs A: GB:CaseleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Perrin / Lindsay Perrin vs Jill Federico / Rob Drouin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Caulton / FREDY GUZMAN vs Karin Conroy / David Reynolds4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoanna Chen / Walter Meltzer vs Lisa Finneral / Jason Straetz2-6, 1-6
2022-04-24vs A: ALG:Farrell:LuneauLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Perrin / Lindsay Perrin vs Jeffrey Hastings / Erin Hosterman3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRaghav Bansal / Shealu Bishop vs Juana Luneau / Jeffrey Stone4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJoanna Chen / Walter Meltzer vs Tim Curran / Tracy Fang5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMatthew Perrin / Lindsay Perrin vs Richard King / Deirdre Ryan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy McManus / Walter Meltzer vs Karen Padgett / Peter Samuelson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShealu Bishop / FREDY GUZMAN vs Terry Gould / Laura Joslin-King6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-03vs B:YMCA:Wardman:BhuttoWon 21
W#1 DoublesMerrill Barnes / William Dean vs David Heck / Jaclyn Race6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Perrin / Lindsay Perrin vs Bob Bhutto / Melissa Eichmann6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesFREDY GUZMAN / Lisa Senora Linder vs Gretchen Lord / Mat Skilliter3-6, 6-7
2022-03-27vs A: GB:CaseleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMerrill Barnes / Walter Meltzer vs Julie Salaun / Daniel Witham6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesNancy McManus / Harald Skardal vs Jill Federico / Kamal Chavda3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Caulton / Raghav Bansal vs Jennifer Taylor / Jason Straetz6-2, 6-4
2022-03-20vs B:RVC:GrotzWon 30
W#1 DoublesMerrill Barnes / William Dean vs Marybeth Dattilio / Radu Stan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy McManus / Matthew Perrin vs Jessica DeSimone / Alexander Bryant6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Caulton / Walter Meltzer vs Allegra Lubrano / Lyle Nichols7-5, 6-3
2022-03-13vs A: ALG:Farrell:LuneauLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Foster / Merrill Barnes vs Drew Barwell / Rebecca Roy0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHarald Skardal / Shealu Bishop vs Jeffrey Stone / Juana Luneau1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWalter Meltzer / Joanna Chen vs David Allen / Cathy Farrell3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed Hybrid 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Merrill Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Lisa Senora Linder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Raghav Bansal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Lindsay Perrin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
David Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Matthew Perrin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Lisa Caulton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Shealu Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Joanna Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Nancy McManus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Harald Skardal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Walter Meltzer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
William Dean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy McManus + David Foster3846% games+4.7% vs expected
Lisa Caulton + Raghav Bansal4154% games+4.3% vs expected
Lindsay Perrin + Matthew Perrin161551% games+4.0% vs expected
Nancy McManus + Walter Meltzer4747% games+3.1% vs expected
David Foster + Merrill Barnes5352% games−2.3% vs expected
Joanna Chen + Walter Meltzer11534% gamesnot enough data
Walter Meltzer + Lisa Caulton9551% gamesnot enough data
Walter Meltzer + Shealu Bishop3748% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Merrill Barnes
104W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
Lisa Senora Linder
104W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Raghav Bansal
81W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
Lindsay Perrin
66W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
David Foster
47W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Perrin
51W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Lisa Caulton
76W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Shealu Bishop
33W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Joanna Chen
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
Nancy McManus
63W–96L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Harald Skardal
15W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Walter Meltzer
42W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Dean
22W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.