Teams

Lagoon Garrett

2025 · 2026 Fall USTA Adult 40 & Over Day League - Montgomery

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Worthy / Ingrid Gamboa vs Wyvonne Johnson / Pam Crider6-0, 6-4
2025-10-28Split 11
W#1 DoublesIngrid Gamboa / Laura Worthy vs Betsey Johns / Sandra Engles6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Bird / Shirley Garrett vs Florence Tyson / Susan Scott2-6, 1-6
2025-10-07vs MCC ChristieWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly DeLaitsch / Ingrid Gamboa vs Christi Christie / Sandra Engles6-2, 6-1
2025-09-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesIngrid Gamboa / Laura Worthy vs Carrie Rhodes / Julie Green6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Fall USTA Adult 40 & Over Day League - Montgomery have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Janice Scott
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Cathy Prueitt
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Laura Worthy
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
3.33
Marge Malone
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
3.29
Kelly DeLaitsch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
3.27
Chessie Mann
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Rachel Todd
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.17
Shirley Garrett
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
3.10
Tracy Bird
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
DEBRA SLEDGE
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Sharon Woernle
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
2.87
Ingrid Gamboa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Regina Dinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
2.76
Joan Ensley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Scott + DEBRA SLEDGE7255% games+5.8% vs expected
Regina Dinger + Sharon Woernle5552% games+2.3% vs expected
Joan Ensley + Regina Dinger121647% games+0.2% vs expected
Joan Ensley + Sharon Woernle2543% games−1.5% vs expected
Chessie Mann + Rachel Todd5451% games−2.8% vs expected
Chessie Mann + Cathy Prueitt134 matchesnot enough data
Ingrid Gamboa + Laura Worthy404 matchesnot enough data
Laura Worthy + Shirley Garrett224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janice Scott
14W–16L career · 12 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.44
3.5
Cathy Prueitt
25W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Laura Worthy
24W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Marge Malone
32W–28L career · 20 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Kelly DeLaitsch
15W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Chessie Mann
23W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Rachel Todd
26W–24L career · 11 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Shirley Garrett
26W–34L career · 13 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Tracy Bird
11W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
DEBRA SLEDGE
36W–23L career · 20 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Sharon Woernle
39W–34L career · 26 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Ingrid Gamboa
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Regina Dinger
40W–57L career · 27 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Joan Ensley
37W–60L career · 25 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.