Teams

Porter/Bentonville/KTC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-12vs Sander/Fayetteville/INDWon 21
L#2 DoublesMeagan Flake / Robin Sumpter vs Lacey Baker / Liz Krauft0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Gibbons vs Annie Frail6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRachael Deboard / Annemarie Porter vs Caroline Sander / Shannon Hendrix7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs Stark/Centerton/PCCWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmanda Gibbons / Lauren Pickman vs Diane Young / Ann Theile6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTracie Larson vs Amanda Philpot6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather Brown / Jessica Kcam Cubas vs Julia Brodie / Kathryn Stark4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKelsi Miller vs Grace McCasland6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRachael Deboard / Annemarie Porter vs Joan Cook / Molly Plummer6-4, 7-5
2025-04-21vs Riley/Elkins/FACLost 05
L#1 DoublesErin Freeze / Amanda Gibbons vs Lyndsey Weber / Maya Kushmaul3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Kcam Cubas vs Sarah Bright1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Pickman / Gillian Ihle vs Brandy Long / Sarah Brady5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTracie Larson vs Melissa King4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Wallace / Robin Sumpter vs Ellen Kinnamon / Kjersti Carpenter4-6, 3-6
2025-04-19vs Gagliardo-Turner/Rogers/SVCCLost 04
L#1 SinglesKelsi Miller vs Samantha Gagliardo2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeagan Flake / Brittany Tolman vs Jackie Vermillion / Cally Turner1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRobin Sumpter vs Samantha Thiede Erickson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRachael Deboard / Sarah Brown vs Christy Williams / Angela Palladino2-6, 4-6
2025-04-01vs Riley/Elkins/FACLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrittany Tolman / Danielle Williams vs Maya Kushmaul / Molly Himes2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Gibbons vs Sarah Bright0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKelsi Miller / Rachael Deboard vs Aysa Galbraith / Brandy Long1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesTracie Larson vs Sarah Brady6-4, 4-6
2025-03-18vs Sander/Fayetteville/INDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelsi Miller / Brittany Tolman vs Holli Hill / Shannon Hendrix6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmanda Gibbons vs Annie Frail6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTracie Larson vs Lacey Baker0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRachael Deboard / Annemarie Porter vs Caroline Sander / Jeanne Rath6-2, 7-5
2025-03-14vs Bianconi/Rogers/MRCLost 23
L#1 DoublesAnnemarie Porter / Meagan Flake vs Abby Bell / Melissa Smith1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Kcam Cubas vs Jennifer Burleson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBrittany Tolman / Danielle Williams vs Kaitlynn Bianconi / Kara Welton6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTracie Larson vs Hattie Kurin2-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesErin Freeze / Gillian Ihle vs Natalie Anderson / Samantha Neel6-7, 3-6
2025-02-28vs Stark/Centerton/PCCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrittany Tolman / Danielle Williams vs Joan Cook / Sally Beemsterboer6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLauren Pickman vs Alison Creasey4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAnnemarie Porter vs Lauren Boozman Northey6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Brown / Robin Sumpter vs Kathryn Stark / Shelby Free0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Amanda Gibbons
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Annemarie Porter
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Lauren Pickman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Jessica Kcam Cubas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brittany Tolman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Tracie Larson
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.61
Rachael Deboard
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.47
Meagan Flake
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Robin Sumpter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Erin Freeze
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gillian Ihle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kelsi Miller
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annemarie Porter + Rachael Deboard314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Gibbons
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Annemarie Porter
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lauren Pickman
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
Jessica Kcam Cubas
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Brittany Tolman
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracie Larson
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Rachael Deboard
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Meagan Flake
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Robin Sumpter
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Erin Freeze
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gillian Ihle
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsi Miller
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.