Teams

DTC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs CP GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesEthel McGlynn / Liz Donahue vs Danielle Dahl / Carrie Palmer2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Killeen vs Sarah Murphy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Montgomery / Julie Snyder vs Esther Song / Emily Rugaber6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElaine Golden Webster / Lindsay Freeman vs Nicoal Sperrazza / Claire Cornell6-7, 5-7
2026-07-09vs WP YELLOWSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKimberly Montgomery / Kristin Bokelman vs Bethany Sheldon / Alison Mizer6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSarah Killeen vs Linda Thurman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEthel McGlynn / Liz Donahue vs Meredith Munro / Jodi Frangiamore6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Snyder / Stephanie Martins vs Kimberly Allen / Sarah Lessner6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-07-02vs LTC-M NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesKimberly Montgomery / Sarah Hart vs Clarissa Manzi / Emily Adams6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Killeen vs Angelique Manley6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEthel McGlynn / Stephanie Martins vs Amy Molnar / Carly Kaufman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Snyder / Laura Rogers vs Amy Whittier / Zoe Epstein6-1, 6-4
2026-06-25vs CP YELLOWWon 31
L#1 DoublesKimberly Montgomery / Kristin Bokelman vs Ashley Banister-Riley / Annie Rapson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEthel McGlynn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElaine Golden Webster / Julie Snyder vs Tamara Bianchi / Dory Pratt5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Killeen / Stephanie Martins vs Valerie Imperial / Jessica Sanderson6-1, 6-2
2026-06-18vs CACM REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristin Bokelman / Natasha Gallaway vs Bev Morrow / Helen Wilson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Killeen vs Regina Fontaine2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Donahue / Stephanie Martins vs Tandy Dilworth / Mary Mathis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Rogers / Sheila Tsai vs Lisa Barnhill / Cathy O'Neill3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-11vs DTP TEALSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristin Bokelman / Natasha Gallaway vs Brae Holdridge / Phaedra Harbaugh4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Martins vs Adele Norton2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Hart / Kimberly Montgomery vs Choon Lee / Jennifer Schneider6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElaine Golden Webster / Laura Rogers vs Connie Friedman / Kim Weeks4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-04vs WP REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesElaine Golden Webster / Ethel McGlynn vs Carrie Denham / Lisa Wells Thies - *3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Killeen vs Lucy Downey6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSheila Tsai / Krista Yamamoto vs Somin Lee / Lindsey Begland1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Hart / Natasha Gallaway vs Nichole Milton / Jennifer Lieb4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Ethel McGlynn
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Kimberly Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Liz Donahue
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephanie Martins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Kristin Bokelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Sarah Killeen
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.26
Julie Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Cristin Bracken
published 3.5
3.23
Lindsay Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Krista Yamamoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Sarah Hart
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Elaine Golden Webster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Natasha Gallaway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Sheila Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Laura Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Montgomery + Julie Snyder5066% games+11.1% vs expected
Kristin Bokelman + Elaine Golden Webster9263% games+7.0% vs expected
Kristin Bokelman + Kimberly Montgomery14559% games+5.4% vs expected
Laura Rogers + Kimberly Montgomery23762% games+5.3% vs expected
Kristin Bokelman + Natasha Gallaway361459% games+5.1% vs expected
Krista Yamamoto + Sheila Tsai23764% games+5.0% vs expected
Sheila Tsai + Elaine Golden Webster11461% games+4.1% vs expected
Sarah Hart + Kimberly Montgomery191158% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ethel McGlynn
45W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
Kimberly Montgomery
75W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Liz Donahue
45W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Stephanie Martins
115W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Kristin Bokelman
105W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Sarah Killeen
42W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Julie Snyder
40W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cristin Bracken
14W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsay Freeman
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Krista Yamamoto
45W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Sarah Hart
48W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elaine Golden Webster
99W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Natasha Gallaway
82W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Sheila Tsai
138W–87L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Laura Rogers
49W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.