Teams

Co.Hicks18C2.5

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-10vs Na.Dahir18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesTucker Andrews / Molly Gorham vs Diane Maginnis / Lori Stevens6-3, 6-3
2025-09-26vs Ke.Hurter18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Barringer / Tucker Andrews vs Amy Cantando / Kelly Hurter3-6, 0-6
2025-09-12vs As.Randall18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessica Barringer / Mary Margaret Ross vs Haley Davies / Rachel Creel7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Applegate / Cate Edwards vs Ashley Whited / Mary Hannah Andrews0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Kuruc / Sarah Hoverstad vs Geri Russell / Heidi Suke1-6, 0-6
2025-08-15vs Ke.Hurter18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Hicks / Tucker Andrews vs Megan Oneill / Rebecca Harris2-6, 0-6
2025-08-08vs As.Randall18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesTucker Andrews / Courtney Hicks vs Ashley Randall / Caroline Williams Aden1-6, 0-6
2025-08-01vs Ra.Rosen18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesTucker Andrews / Molly Gorham vs Jennifer Cotner / Darsan Russo1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Mary Margaret Ross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Cate Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Jessica Barringer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Blair Cobb
published 2.5
2.40
Courtney Hicks
published 2.5
2.37
Tucker Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Anna Applegate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cameron Leonard
published 2.5
2.10
Sarah Hoverstad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Anna Kuruc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kaitlyn Floyd
published
Molly Gorham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Barringer + Mary Margaret Ross5261% games+10.9% vs expected
Courtney Hicks + Tucker Andrews303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Margaret Ross
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%12%88%
2.66
3
Cate Edwards
14W–7L career · type D · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Jessica Barringer
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Blair Cobb
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
2.5
Courtney Hicks
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Tucker Andrews
44W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Anna Applegate
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cameron Leonard
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Hoverstad
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Anna Kuruc
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kaitlyn Floyd
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Gorham
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.