Teams

Racquet Club 2

2024 Winter Combo · 2024 Winter Combo 6.5 WOMEN Monday

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-13vs WickertreeLost 12
L#1 DoublesPei-An Chao / Nonia Wolf vs Yvette DeLisio / Tyler Nunemaker2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSabina Jenkins / Michelle Roettger vs Melissa Dine / Mary Thompson6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesYumi Willard / Dianne Slicker vs Ami Latham / Elizabeth Thomas5-7, 2-5
2024-05-06vs Scarborough 2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Roettger / Nonia Wolf vs Shannon Girardi / Andrea Perlenfein6-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesTracy Steinbrenner / Kim Dick vs Kate Carroll / Mary Crall2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDianne Slicker / Yumi Willard vs Chelsea Day / Reem Ghanem6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-29vs Olympic 1Won 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Shaffer / Yumi Willard vs Becky Savage / Elizabeth Miller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNonia Wolf / Michelle Roettger vs Alisa Disalvo / Deborah Marks6-7, 5-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSabina Jenkins / Jana Lakatos vs Cynthia Pawlarczyk / Georgann Long6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-22vs The Player's Club 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNonia Wolf / Yumi Willard vs Shelly Krauss / Megan Stout5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSabina Jenkins / Pei-An Chao vs Anne Lohrmann / Emily North6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Burian / Paige Wood vs Tricia Honeycutt / Jen Reis2-6, 5-7
2024-04-15vs Scarborough 1Won 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Shaffer / Susan Edison vs Jeslyn Eskander / Nancy Graesser6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNonia Wolf / Jana Lakatos vs Jennifer Schoenfeld / Natosha Eskander3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSabina Jenkins / Michelle Roettger vs Amy Stang / Kendra Strawser4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-01vs Scarborough 2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNonia Wolf / Yumi Willard vs Shannon Girardi / Andrea Perlenfein7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSabina Jenkins / Pei-An Chao vs Marilee Hanna / Nell Mayo6-7, 2-3
L#3 DoublesCarol Sweeney / Dianne Slicker vs Natalia Sztryk / Chelsea Day2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 Winter Combo 6.5 WOMEN Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Sabina Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Michelle Roettger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Kim Dick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Yumi Willard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Pei-An Chao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Susan Edison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Sweeney
published 3
Dianne Slicker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Paige Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Donna Burian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Donna Baney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Jana Lakatos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Tracy Steinbrenner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nonia Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Shaffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabina Jenkins + Dianne Slicker22861% games+7.5% vs expected
Sabina Jenkins + Michelle Roettger5263% games+6.6% vs expected
Yumi Willard + Sabina Jenkins7852% games+3.8% vs expected
Sabina Jenkins + Pei-An Chao5254% games+2.5% vs expected
Yumi Willard + Pei-An Chao171551% games−0.1% vs expected
Jana Lakatos + Pei-An Chao4744% games−1.8% vs expected
Jana Lakatos + Sabina Jenkins5253% gamesnot enough data
Sabina Jenkins + Nonia Wolf134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sabina Jenkins
123W–91L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Michelle Roettger
84W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
Kim Dick
30W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.92
Yumi Willard
130W–118L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Pei-An Chao
96W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Susan Edison
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Carol Sweeney
27W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dianne Slicker
52W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paige Wood
93W–95L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74
Donna Burian
33W–55L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Donna Baney
48W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63
Jana Lakatos
70W–133L career · 2 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.56
Tracy Steinbrenner
44W–130L career · 1 line in 2024
0%79%21%
2.39
Nonia Wolf
63W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Shaffer
31W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.