Teams

HMTC RED

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-18vs TAG BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Stout / Rona van Sickle vs Lisa Novacek / Michelle Sheets0-6, 3-6
2024-06-11vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesRosalie Krammer / Rona van Sickle vs Tracy Hutton / Karen Trevino4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-04vs MLF PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesRosalie Krammer / Christine Richardson vs Tricia Diehl / Pat Athey6-7, 2-6
2024-05-28vs LVTA YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Barnes / Katheryn Hill vs Lesa Morrill-Hughes / Ashley Kasprzak2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Karen Johnson vs Debbie Hansen / Nancy Pflughoeft4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRona van Sickle / Judy Stout vs Cathy Simon / Kathy Jacobson2-6, 1-6
2024-05-21vs FCCC WHITELost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Ball / Katheryn Hill vs Haley Hasler / Julia Tynan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Stout / Sandra Barnes vs Aileen VanMeveren / Kaylyn Shelby0-6, 0-6
2024-05-14vs TAG BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesRosalie Krammer / Judy Stout vs Lisa Novacek / Janice Mossberg4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatheryn Hill / Karen Johnson vs Amber Slade / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik4-6, 2-6
2024-05-07vs CSU GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Johnson / Katheryn Hill vs Maisie Knowles / Brittney Stephenson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Ball / Rona van Sickle vs Kristen Frisch / Erin Dirvonas3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Richardson / Teresa Adsit vs Tracy Hutton / Andrea Flake5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Katheryn Hill
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Teresa Adsit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Rosalie Krammer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Rona van Sickle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.69
Wendy Ball
published
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rona van Sickle + Judy Stout3446% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Adsit + Judy Stout1532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katheryn Hill
35W–53L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.14
3
Teresa Adsit
81W–107L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
Rosalie Krammer
20W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Rona van Sickle
15W–40L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Wendy Ball
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 4 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.