← Teams

SHC-Visse

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.1 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Kim Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.90
Jennifer Trank
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Heck
published 3
2.56
Gina Mandel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Karla Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-11-13Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Trank / Nancy Heck vs Ellen Bradley / Evelyne Cassell6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesGina Mandel / Teresa Metke vs Shuping Li / Judy Chaput6-2, 7-5
2022-11-04Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesDenise Visse / Kim Christensen vs Kathy Cooke / Deborah Cohen6-1, 6-2
2022-10-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesGina Mandel / Karen Simon vs Margaret Convery / Inge Marshall6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTeresa Metke / Karla Hendrickson vs JaReda Webb / Melissa Bothne6-4, 6-0
2022-10-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / Lillian Lee vs Christina Gibson / Theresa Luthi4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Christensen / Denise Visse vs Fran Hepp / Cheryl Lolich6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Trank / Bess Jacobo vs Marianne Conroy / Sanae Ito6-2, 6-4
2022-10-02Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Heck / Jennifer Trank vs Julie Yang / Barbara Friesen6-0, 6-2
2022-09-25Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Trank / Nancy Heck vs Shuping Li / Lisa Hockman1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGina Mandel / Karen Simon vs Ellen Bradley / Sally Sullivan6-1, 6-3
2022-09-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJennifer Trank / Nancy Heck vs Deborah Cohen / Tracy Laidley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGina Mandel / Teresa Metke vs Kristin DeVoto / Laney Kibel7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDenise Visse / Karla Hendrickson vs Irene Gilbertson / Denise Townsend6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kim Christensen
41W–43L career
17%82%1%
3.13
3
Jennifer Trank
93W–104L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Nancy Heck
17W–17L career
6%92%2%
2.73
3
Gina Mandel
21W–32L career
30%70%1%
2.56
3
Karla Hendrickson
41W–109L career
18%82%0%
2.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.