Teams

YMCA Mt Brook- Dasher

2025 B'ham Winter Weekday - Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women Tuesday

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-25vs West Homewod - McDuff/HughesWon 41
L#1 DoublesStephanie Lott / Natalie Markham vs Holly Daugherty / Jennifer Chadha5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAnnie Crump vs Ellen Buckner6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLuci McMillan / Lin Chen vs Jennifer McCain / Jodi McDuff6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNital Patel vs Lauren Denton7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniela Barber / Brandi Dasher vs Holly Stiles / Jenni Falkner6-1, 6-1
2025-02-21vs Vestavia C. Club - KirkpatrickWon 50
W#1 DoublesLuci McMillan / Nital Patel vs Kate Thompson / Debbie Castleberry6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnnie Crump vs Lauren Jameson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Markham / Stephanie Lott vs Julie Bray / Laura Kirkpatrick7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLin Chen vs Julie Kirkpatrick6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniela Barber / Brandi Dasher vs Jamie Manning / Julie Cundiff6-1, 6-3
2025-02-18vs Hoover C. Club - Ellerman/PughWon 41
W#1 DoublesAnnie Crump / Natalie Markham vs Julie Doll / Elana Swiney6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNital Patel vs Jamye Litty6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDaniela Barber / Brandi Dasher vs Courtney Richard / Meagan Ellerman1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLuci McMillan vs Lena Martinez6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRosemary Alexander / Stephanie Lott vs Shannon Johnston / Kelly Connelly6-2, 6-0
2025-02-11vs BH - EbertWon 32
W#1 DoublesNital Patel / Luci McMillan vs Ann Wade Shreve / Lisa Little6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnnie Crump vs Samantha Ebert3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniela Barber / Natalie Markham vs Maurine Halpern / Monica Vinoski6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLin Chen vs Leigh Louis0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRosemary Alexander / Stephanie Lott vs Elizabeth Humphreys / Rachel Presley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-06vs PRC - BassWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnnie Crump / Brandi Dasher vs Meagan Beard / Valerie Holmes7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNital Patel vs Jennifer Ristic6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLin Chen / Daniela Barber vs Mickey Armstrong / Aimee Sims6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNatalie Markham vs Jill Harris7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-04vs Highland - MooreWon 41
L#1 DoublesAnnie Crump / Brandi Dasher vs Mary Allen Diddell / Linda Tisdale0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDaniela Barber vs Anna Emblom6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuci McMillan / Stephanie Lott vs Mary Bell / Ruth Berry6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNital Patel vs Sherri Lynn Murdock6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNatalie Markham / Rosemary Alexander vs Kelley Moore / Amy Acker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-03vs GGCC - WilsonLost 23
L#1 DoublesLuci McMillan / Rosemary Alexander vs Leslie Kramer / Kelly Darden3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAnnie Crump vs Karen Schaffers6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrandi Dasher / Nital Patel vs Whitney Wilson / Marilyn Pauls5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDaniela Barber vs Allyson Herritt6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNatalie Markham / Lin Chen vs Sara Oatridge / Sara Copenhaver3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Annie Crump
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.77
Daniela Barber
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.53
Nital Patel
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.33
Natalie Markham
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.13
Stephanie Lott
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.02
Luci McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brandi Dasher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lin Chen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luci McMillan + Nital Patel5069% games+22.5% vs expected
Annie Crump + Nital Patel7363% games+10.4% vs expected
Daniela Barber + Nital Patel5063% games+1.7% vs expected
Brandi Dasher + Daniela Barber213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annie Crump
24W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Daniela Barber
51W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Nital Patel
43W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Natalie Markham
19W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Stephanie Lott
15W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Luci McMillan
14W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Brandi Dasher
6W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lin Chen
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.