Teams

Shadow Cliff 40-Love

2024 18 & Over Fall Weekend Women - NA · 3.5 Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-16vs WARRIORSLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Johnson / Peggy Ussery vs Rhonda Stacy / Amanda Mays0-6, 4-6
2024-11-05vs Fair Oaks Double ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Johnson / Alexia Nadler vs Michelle Pettit / Stephanie Asfeld6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-19vs Friday’s FaultLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeggy Ussery / Jamie Johnson vs Karen Smith / Cassie Villegas6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-09-28vs Awesome TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Johnson / Peggy Ussery vs Theresa Holland / KATHERINE GILLIGAN6-0, 7-5
2024-09-14vs Shavano Spice SquirrelsLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeggy Ussery / Jamie Johnson vs Dennie Huchingson / Margaret Pruitt3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Sylvia Garza
published
Alexia Nadler
published 3.5
3.23
Gina Lehman
published 3.5
3.17
Talat Shah
published
3.14
Isabel Garcia
published 3.5
3.12
Madeline Salazar
published
3.09
Dawn Haase
published 3.5
3.06
Sandy Pena
published
3.04
Peggy Ussery
published
3.03
Tina Yee
published
2.95
Jamie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Erika Ganey
published 3.5
2.79
Barbara Ennis
published 3
Raquel Fascino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Isabel Garcia + Tina Yee1632% games−16.6% vs expected
Erika Ganey + Isabel Garcia134 matchesnot enough data
Isabel Garcia + Dawn Haase044 matchesnot enough data
Erika Ganey + Gina Lehman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sylvia Garza
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Alexia Nadler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Gina Lehman
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Talat Shah
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Isabel Garcia
4W–25L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Madeline Salazar
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dawn Haase
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sandy Pena
19W–20L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Peggy Ussery
29W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Tina Yee
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Jamie Johnson
4W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
3.5
Erika Ganey
8W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Barbara Ennis
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Raquel Fascino
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.