Teams

Meullenet/Fayetteville/SRC

2025 Adult Singles 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-27vs King/Fayetteville/SRCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMyra Dallas vs Gina Beckstead6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSherry Carpenter vs Kaye Collier6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCynthia Meullenet vs Cezanne Garlinghouse6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-18vs King/Fayetteville/SRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesCynthia Meullenet vs Melissa King6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSherry Carpenter vs Kaye Collier3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMyra Dallas vs Cezanne Garlinghouse6-3, 6-0
2026-02-17vs King/Fayetteville/SRCWon 30
W#1 SinglesCynthia Meullenet vs Cezanne Garlinghouse6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMyra Dallas vs Melissa King6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSherry Carpenter vs Gina Beckstead6-4, 6-2
2026-01-30vs King/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesCynthia Meullenet vs Gina Beckstead7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLeigh Verucchi vs Kaye Collier1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMyra Dallas vs Melissa King6-0, 7-5
2026-01-15vs King/Fayetteville/SRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesSherry Carpenter vs Melissa King3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLeigh Verucchi vs Gina Beckstead2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCynthia Meullenet vs Cezanne Garlinghouse6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-12-10vs King/Fayetteville/SRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesSherry Carpenter vs Melissa King3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesCynthia Meullenet vs Kaye Collier6-2, 7-5
L#3 SinglesLeigh Verucchi vs Cezanne Garlinghouse6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Meullenet/Fayetteville/SRC3311716137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Myra Dallas
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Cynthia Meullenet
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.67
Sherry Carpenter
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.43
Leigh Verucchi
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Carpenter + Leigh Verucchi134 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Meullenet + Leigh Verucchi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Myra Dallas
25W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Cynthia Meullenet
31W–38L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Sherry Carpenter
15W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
Leigh Verucchi
3W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.