Teams

Life Time Ruby

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 2.5 Day

15 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-02-10vs WCC: Serve-ivorsLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Shuli / Anita Ware vs Karina Verni / Helen Woods2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim MacRi / Milena Fried vs Lindsey Lee / Erin Brooks1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLiz Chbosky / Ilana Seidman vs Jennifer Eylward / Debbie Spano6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Mingzhang Zeng
published
2.26
Kim MacRi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Massaro
published 2.5
Anita Rosner
published 2.5
2.24
Liz Chbosky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Helen Shuli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Anita Ware
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Ilana Seidman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Valerie Limekiller
published
1.97
Milena Fried
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.90
Jenna Lebowich
published
Ilene McNulty
published
Jessica Brown
published
Shanequa Louissaint
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Shuli + Liz Chbosky4350% gamesnot enough data
Helen Shuli + Kim MacRi1541% gamesnot enough data
Kim MacRi + Milena Fried1441% gamesnot enough data
Jenna Lebowich + Jessica Brown044 matchesnot enough data
Anita Ware + Helen Shuli123 matchesnot enough data
Ilene McNulty + Kim MacRi033 matchesnot enough data
Ilene McNulty + Valerie Limekiller213 matchesnot enough data
Kim MacRi + Mingzhang Zeng123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mingzhang Zeng
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Kim MacRi
20W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Andrea Massaro
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anita Rosner
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Carol Froehlich-Hull
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Liz Chbosky
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Helen Shuli
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Anita Ware
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Ilana Seidman
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Valerie Limekiller
8W–22L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Milena Fried
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Jenna Lebowich
7W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Ilene McNulty
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Brown
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shanequa Louissaint
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.