Teams

Novak - BCC Royalty

2025 Lynchburg Combo Mixed · Lynchburg Combo Mixed 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-14vs BCC - JesterLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Bowden / Elizabeth Gill vs Bill Finigan / Whitney Perrow5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTim Hellewell / Elizabeth Green vs Stuart Tinsley / Kate Tinsley3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Will / Lynn Will vs Kenneth Hite / Denise Eubank5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-12-06vs BCC - JesterWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gill / John Bowden vs Stacey Basten / Scott Rainey6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Green / Tim Hellewell vs Kenneth Hite / Melody Glenn6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Larson / Charlie Larson vs Phillip Miller / Allison Ebert7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-11-30vs OCC - Bell - Consistency CountsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Creasy / Rachele Novak vs Chad Rakos / Emily Evans0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Will / Lynn Will vs Alexander Deal / Jennifer Smith Ramey3-6, 2-6
2025-11-08vs OCC - Bell - Consistency CountsLost 12
W#1 DoublesTim Hellewell / Rachele Novak vs Chad Rakos / Allison Rakos2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Bowden / Jenn Dean vs Jesse Naples / Janika Carey0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharlie Larson / Susan Larson vs Alexander Deal / Emily Evans5-7, 3-6
2025-11-01vs BCC - JesterLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Mowry / Jenn Dean vs Bill Finigan / Cheryl Betz0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Will / Lynn Will vs Stuart Tinsley / Stacey Basten2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTim Hellewell / Elizabeth Green vs Scott Rainey / Whitney Perrow6-7, 4-6
2025-10-26vs BCC - JesterLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Mowry / Jenn Dean vs Bill Finigan / Cheryl Betz2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Bowden / Rachele Novak vs Stuart Tinsley / Kate Tinsley4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMark Creasy / Elizabeth Green vs William Eubank / Denise Eubank6-3, 6-0
2025-10-22vs OCC - Bell - Consistency CountsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Hellewell / Elizabeth Green vs Moki Chawla / Elizabeth Bogle2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristopher Mowry / Jenn Dean vs Federico Holgado / Emily Evans3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Creasy / Colleen Miller vs Chad Rakos / Allison Rakos7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs BCC - JesterLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Creasy / Rachele Novak vs Bill Finigan / Cheryl Betz2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Will / Jenn Dean vs Scott Rainey / Whitney Perrow2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharlie Larson / Susan Larson vs Gary Sibcy / Lory Sibcy6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs OCC - Bell - Consistency CountsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Bowden / Elizabeth Gill vs Moki Chawla / Elizabeth Bogle7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharlie Larson / Susan Larson vs Chad Rakos / Janika Carey6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Will / Lynn Will vs Larry Bell / Jennifer Smith Ramey3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Susan Larson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Tim Hellewell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Lynn Will
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Charlie Larson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Jenn Dean
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Rachele Novak
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Christopher Mowry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
John Bowden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mark Creasy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Will
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Larson + Charlie Larson1449% gamesnot enough data
Michael Will + Lynn Will044 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Mowry + Jenn Dean033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Larson
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.61
Tim Hellewell
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Lynn Will
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Charlie Larson
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jenn Dean
4W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Rachele Novak
13W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Christopher Mowry
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Bowden
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Creasy
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Will
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.