Teams

Southampton Lane/Greiner

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-28vs Raintree McGaritySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Earley / Sandra Mason vs Tarja Kostin / Jill Campbell4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Carol Gregory vs Janice McGarity / Angela Verdery6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-21vs ACAC AlleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Earley / Christy Holt vs Julie Ruth / Elizabeth Kimball7-5, 6-4
2021-06-14vs CCV AlleyWon 21
W#2 DoublesLaura Earley / Sandra Mason vs Megan Hupp / Cindy Howell6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCourtney Greiner vs Karen Williamson6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEmily Huang / Karna Hyman vs Teresa Whitworth / Blair Dillard5-7, 4-6
2021-06-07vs WOCC CrowellWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Lane / Laura Earley vs Tracy Buzzeo / Ashley Hart6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-24vs HCC Fisher / HolmesWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Earley / Cherie Lane vs Kathryn Hall / Jan Marshall6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Emily Huang vs Sally Caldwell / Aynsley Fisher6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-21vs Salisbury Berry Got BackhandSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCherie Lane / Laura Earley vs Tamara Beck Jacquet / Jennifer Moreno3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCourtney Greiner vs Beth Gardner2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Courtney Greiner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Laura Earley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Logan Glen
published
3.99
Casey Carnohan
published 4
3.98
Crystal Gibson
published 4
3.89
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.73
Emily Huang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Christy Holt
published 4
3.58
LaVera Williams
published
Karna Hyman
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Greiner
117W–118L career · 4 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Laura Earley
83W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.08
Logan Glen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Casey Carnohan
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Crystal Gibson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.98
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Emily Huang
44W–58L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christy Holt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
LaVera Williams
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
Karna Hyman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.