Teams

Protz/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-30vs Rucks/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesStephanie Protz / Cynthia Madson vs Paula Rucks / Tonya Messer6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBarbara Zwerner vs Lauren O'Brien7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKelly Dawson / Elisa Hill vs Sheryl Carmack / Lisa Evans3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmelia Stephens / Stephanie Hill vs Kelly Carter / Claire Martin6-1, 6-2
2025-04-09vs Rucks/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Kirby-Piovarcy / Sherri Givens vs Mary Beth Tabor / Jennifer Etheridge4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmelia Stephens / Stephanie Hill vs Paula Rucks / Tonya Messer5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElisa Hill / Cynthia Madson vs Sheryl Carmack / Lisa Evans4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesStephanie Protz / Aimee Lawson vs Rachel Poole / Claire Martin6-0, 6-0
2025-03-19vs Rucks/NashvilleWon 31
L#1 DoublesStephanie Protz / Amelia Stephens vs Mary Beth Tabor / Jennifer Etheridge4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBarbara Zwerner vs Claire Martin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElisa Hill / Cynthia Madson vs Kristen Accardo / Rachel Poole6-1, 6-1
W#4 DoublesMonica Kenny / Romina Graham vs Lauren O'Brien / Kelly Carter6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Stephanie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Aimee Lawson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.08
Sherri Givens
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Stephanie Protz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Elisa Hill
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Barbara Zwerner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Monica Kenny
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Amelia Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Romina Graham
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Sherri Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Cynthia Madson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Cathy-Jo Elwood
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Anne Ammons
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amelia Stephens + Stephanie Hill3353% games+9.8% vs expected
Anne Ammons + Monica Kenny10262% games+9.2% vs expected
Cynthia Madson + Elisa Hill3350% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Protz + Sherri Givens4167% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy + Barbara Zwerner314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy + Stephanie Protz303 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Protz + Stephanie Hill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hill
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Aimee Lawson
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Sherri Givens
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
29W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Stephanie Protz
29W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Elisa Hill
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Barbara Zwerner
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Monica Kenny
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Amelia Stephens
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Romina Graham
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Sherri Jones
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Cynthia Madson
23W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cathy-Jo Elwood
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Anne Ammons
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.