Teams

Team 8 Challengers

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-18vs Team 4 RBGCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesEvan Starcevic / STEPHEN STANDING vs Peter Clyne / Jie Shi6-4, 6-3
2025-03-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesSTEPHEN STANDING / Edwin Donovan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-01vs Team 5 Unstrung HeroesWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Craig / STEPHEN STANDING vs Mark Serway / Majed Hamawy6-3, 3-5
2025-02-23vs Team 1 Full Metal RacketLost 01
L#3 DoublesEvan Starcevic / Edwin Donovan vs Mark Herrington / Robert Cheron6-7, 4-3, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Team 6 HitmenLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Shen / Alberto Zuazo vs Jay Ghazal / Mark Pinho3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Jensen / Alberto Zapata vs Eric Wagner / Don Bakke5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Craig / Johnathan Missner vs Michael Poth / Subir Jossan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-04vs Team 4 RBGCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohnathan Missner / STEPHEN STANDING vs John DeMoors / Ali Ghatri6-7, 2-3
2025-01-24vs Team 7 CourtmastersLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdwin Donovan / STEPHEN STANDING vs Connell Loftus / David Parks1-6, 3-6
2025-01-09vs Team 3 Ageless All StarsLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Craig / Edwin Donovan vs John Zott / Fred Stein2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Mark Shen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Mark Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Johnathan Missner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Christopher Craig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Tyler Duvall
published
2.82
Alberto Zuazo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
John Cummins
published
2.76
Edwin Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Alberto Zapata
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
STEPHEN STANDING
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

STEPHEN STANDING + Edwin Donovan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Shen
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Mark Jensen
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Johnathan Missner
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Christopher Craig
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Tyler Duvall
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Alberto Zuazo
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
John Cummins
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Edwin Donovan
19W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Alberto Zapata
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
STEPHEN STANDING
21W–71L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.