Teams

SDNC WC 4.0 KCP/ Nguyen

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles SDNC- WE · SDNC Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-12vs SDNC 4.0 TC Vista/ VencillWon 20
W#2 DoublesKenny Rosenberg / Michael Russo vs Bill Lenaway / Evan Green6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKien Johnson / Andrew Nguyen vs Chris Roth / Scott Quintal6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-11-05vs SDNC 4.0 FRCC/ GehrkeWon 10
W#2 DoublesKien Johnson / Michael Russo vs Dave Gehrke / Todd Bulich6-1, 6-2
2023-10-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesDon Plunkett / Michael Russo vs Scott Hecker / Brian Lynn6-4, 6-3
2023-10-15vs SDNC 4.0 Rancho Del Oro/ JaureguyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDon Plunkett / Pajseu Lochungvu vs Mark Moosburner / Ugur Eskiocak4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDon Plunkett / Pajseu Lochungvu vs Stefan Scheinert / Byrton Slack6-1, 6-1
2023-09-10vs SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC/ RobergeWon 10
W#1 DoublesDon Plunkett / Andrew Nguyen vs Ron Roberge / Puneet Khurana6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Billy Arenas
published 4
3.86
Pajseu Lochungvu
published
3.83
Marc Kieu
published 4
3.76
Kien Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Don Plunkett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Michael Russo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Haytham Allos
published 4
3.51
Jeff Oslance
published
Kenny Rosenberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Russo + Kien Johnson111151% gamesnot enough data
Don Plunkett + Michael Russo6160% gamesnot enough data
Don Plunkett + Kien Johnson4261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Billy Arenas
68W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%44%
3.98
Pajseu Lochungvu
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Marc Kieu
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Kien Johnson
82W–80L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Don Plunkett
56W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Michael Russo
107W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Haytham Allos
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
Jeff Oslance
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Kenny Rosenberg
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.