Teams

NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Gosheff

NIN FW Adult 18 & Over · NIN FW 18 & Over 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · NIN FW 18 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN FW 1&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner90341129307
2NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: SP LE45212453421
3NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Gosheff45222354422
4NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel18133267477

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gregory Shoda
published
Randy Wilson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gregory Shoda
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Wilson
42W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.