Teams

Pernici/40/8.5/CWN/QTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 8.5 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming
Sep 9 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 16 7:30 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Sep 23 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 30 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hammack/40/8.5/CWN/POTC000000
2Pernici/40/8.5/CWN/QTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Carla Hildebrand
published 4.5
4.19
Stacy Haren
published
4.02
Sheila Pernici
published
4.02
Tammy Cannon
published
3.82
Tracy Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Jorie OBrien
published
3.67
Kelly Stratton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keri Fidelak
published
Laura Hogg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Hildebrand + Sheila Pernici5650% games−12.9% vs expected
Carla Hildebrand + Stacy Haren213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Hildebrand
19W–24L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Stacy Haren
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Sheila Pernici
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Tammy Cannon
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Tracy Elliott
41W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Jorie OBrien
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
Kelly Stratton
56W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Keri Fidelak
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Hogg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.