Teams

Ladies Quads

2023 Sequoyah Quads - Spring '23 · Quads

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Quads have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Ashlyn Thornton
published 3.5
3.16
Regina Hicks
published
2.86
Karlene Welty
published
2.58
Angela Evans
published 3
2.54
Vivian White
published
2.07
Tina Waggoner
published
1.73
Crystal Boone
published 2.5
Lisa Still
published
Mary Sheppard
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashlyn Thornton
76W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Regina Hicks
25W–21L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
Karlene Welty
13W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Angela Evans
18W–34L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
2.58
Vivian White
22W–30L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Tina Waggoner
0W–24L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Crystal Boone
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.73
Lisa Still
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Sheppard
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.