Teams

Laredo Team B

Adult 40 & Over League · Women's 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-30vs Laredo Team ALost 13
L#1 DoublesXandra Minarro / Elidia Grubbs vs Melissa Ahumada / Mayela Saad1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBarbara Mendez vs Maria Diez0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMILERSY RODRIGUEZ / Nilda Garcia vs Marisela Canamar / Patricia Carranza7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesOlivia Gonzalez / GABRIELA de LUNA vs Alice Werstak / Minnie Dora Haynes Rodriguez3-6, 1-6
2026-04-28vs Laredo Team ALost 04
L#1 DoublesNilda Garcia / MILERSY RODRIGUEZ vs Mayela Saad / Sonia Pena2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSARA VILLARREAL vs Sara Lascari2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMirian Mendoza / Elsa Pena vs Lizette Mora / SELINA TREVINO1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Mendez / Minerva Santos vs Amelie Jane / Alice Werstak3-6, 2-6
2026-04-22vs Laredo Team ALost 13
W#1 DoublesMILERSY RODRIGUEZ / Nilda Garcia vs Melissa Ahumada / Raquel Gomez7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBarbara Mendez vs Sara Lascari0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMinerva Santos / GABRIELA de LUNA vs Marisela Canamar / SELINA TREVINO4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElsa Pena / SARA VILLARREAL vs Ana Mancera / Amelie Jane0-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs Laredo Team ALost 04
L#1 DoublesMinerva Santos / Monica Mendoza vs Raquel Gomez / Patricia Carranza0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesGABRIELA de LUNA vs Maria Diez4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAna Alvarez / Olivia Gonzalez vs Mayela Saad / Sonia Pena3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElsa Pena / Barbara Mendez vs Pravina Mulchand / Minnie Dora Haynes Rodriguez3-6, 3-6
2026-04-15vs Laredo Team ALost 13
W#1 DoublesAna Alvarez / Olivia Gonzalez vs Ana Mancera / Maria Diez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSARA VILLARREAL vs Lizette Mora2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Mendez / Elsa Pena vs Melissa Ahumada / Pravina Mulchand1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Mendoza / Mirian Mendoza vs Sara Lascari / Raquel Gomez0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Laredo Team A501736105
2Laredo Team B0531735236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Nilda Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
MILERSY RODRIGUEZ
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elidia Grubbs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Ana Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Olivia Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
GABRIELA de LUNA
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Minerva Santos
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
SARA VILLARREAL
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.11
Mirian Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.00
Elsa Pena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.98
Barbara Mendez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Xandra Minarro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MILERSY RODRIGUEZ + Nilda Garcia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nilda Garcia
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
MILERSY RODRIGUEZ
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Elidia Grubbs
8W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Ana Alvarez
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Olivia Gonzalez
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
GABRIELA de LUNA
0W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Minerva Santos
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
SARA VILLARREAL
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.27
Mirian Mendoza
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Elsa Pena
0W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Barbara Mendez
0W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Xandra Minarro
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.