Teams

Grimaldi-Superbreakers

2024 MIXED 18 & OVER SUMMER · 6.0 MX (SUN)

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Jackson / Pravesh Napaul vs Tony Nauth / JANSEL HUTTON2-6, 2-6
2024-07-21vs Fredrickson SummerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Jackson / Kendall Griffith vs Megan Gelhar / Adam Wedwick1-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs Bartone: LIFE IS STILL GOODWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Jackson / Jason Mooty vs Joseph Kalugdan / Barbara Noble6-4, 6-3
2024-05-19vs Eidbo/Winberg: Sundae ServersWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Jackson / Dean Pekarek vs Emma Robasse / Forest Eidbo6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kristin Kroeger
published
3.26
Heather Legris
published 3.5
3.18
Michelle Joncas
published
3.17
Mike Grimaldi
published
2.93
Pamela Snyder
published
2.87
2.85
Kendall Griffith
published
2.79
Sarah Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Brad Gear
published 3
2.50
Corey Robertson
published 2.5
Jason Mooty
published
Matt Melbye
published
Michael Legris
published
Pravesh Napaul
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Legris + Michael Legris3447% gamesnot enough data
Mike Grimaldi + Corey Robertson314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Legris + Pravesh Napaul033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Jackson + Michael Legris213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Grimaldi + Danielle Grimaldi213 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Griffith + Kristin Kroeger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Kroeger
43W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.27
3.5
Heather Legris
26W–25L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Michelle Joncas
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Mike Grimaldi
12W–20L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Pamela Snyder
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Danielle Grimaldi
29W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.87
Kendall Griffith
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
Sarah Jackson
83W–55L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Brad Gear
0W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Corey Robertson
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%52%48%
2.50
Jason Mooty
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Melbye
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Legris
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pravesh Napaul
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.