Teams

SFV - Racketeers/Y Brooks & L Peralta

2025 Mixed 40 SFV Spring · SFV 40 & Over - 6.0 MxD

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-26vs SFV - TL Tempest/Aladjem & BermanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Soucy / Christine O'Neal vs Laura Aladjem / Mark Cwern6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Korerat / Letty King vs Marcia Berman / Stephen Garrett6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Buik / Serena Gittisarn vs Tommy Johnson / Charissa Smith6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - 6.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Michael Pazirandeh
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Aldo Angrisani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Bruce Lilly
published 3.5
3.23
Glen Chester
published
3.01
Michael Soucy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
2.94
Christine O'Neal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
David Buik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jeffrey Korerat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Tisha San Miguel
published
2.83
Serena Wang
published
2.69
Letty King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Lawrence Dunbar
published
Liberty Peralta
published
Serena Gittisarn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Ripsee
published
Yvonne Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Korerat + Letty King314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michael Pazirandeh
83W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
3.5
Aldo Angrisani
93W–85L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Bruce Lilly
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Glen Chester
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Michael Soucy
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Cholada Treepunprasert
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Christine O'Neal
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
David Buik
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Jeffrey Korerat
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Tisha San Miguel
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Serena Wang
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Letty King
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Lawrence Dunbar
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Liberty Peralta
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Serena Gittisarn
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tara Ripsee
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvonne Brooks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.