Teams

Sunrise/Giampaolo

2025 Broward Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-18vs Piccolo/GentileWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarianne Rivas / Hernando Rivas vs Maria Avellaneda / LUIS HERNANDEZ6-4, 7-6
2025-04-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesFranco de Andreis / Maria Perez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-21vs HeronBay/GoetzLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarianne Rivas / Hernando Rivas vs Mauricio Camacho / Daniela Romay3-6, 4-6
2025-03-14vs Midtown/DuranteLost 01
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Jane / Franco de Andreis vs Mel Tejada / Florina Lazar0-6, 6-7
2025-02-28vs Midtown/BarronWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarianne Rivas / Hernando Rivas vs Laura Hernandez / Christian Hernandez6-0, 6-2
2025-02-21vs Browardi/Schubert/40&OverX7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne Rivas / Hernando Rivas vs Ana Pastorino / Rodrigo Villamarin7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-14vs Piccolo/GentileWon 10
W#1 DoublesFranco de Andreis / Jocelyn Jane vs Roberto Gentile / ELEONORA TADDEI6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
3.81
Franco de Andreis
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Marianne Rivas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
3.31
Maria Lanza
published
2.91
Gilberto Giampaolo
published
2.87
Jocelyn Jane
published
2.67
Hernando Rivas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
Roberto Palma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marianne Rivas + Hernando Rivas6850% games−0.1% vs expected
Daniela Hernandez + Gilberto Giampaolo2347% games−5.8% vs expected
Franco de Andreis + Daniela Hernandez1539% games−7.2% vs expected
Marianne Rivas + Franco de Andreis7553% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniela Hernandez
32W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Franco de Andreis
237W–172L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Marianne Rivas
324W–152L career · 15 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Alberto de la Rosa
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Maria Lanza
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Gilberto Giampaolo
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jocelyn Jane
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Hernando Rivas
31W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Roberto Palma
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.