Teams

SFV - Wise Aces/Slaughter

2025 Adult 55 SFV Spring · SFV 55+ WeekDay - 7.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 55+ WeekDay - 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Lupe Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Elyse Gainor
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.39
Nicole Martino
published
3.37
Teri McClure
published
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Arianne Rudes
published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Christine Steele
published 3.5
3.18
Michelle Parent
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Vicki Weinstein
published
3.13
Adele Slaughter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Cindy Gaytan
published 3.5
3.05
Barbara Brabec
published 3.5
3.04
Margery Teller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Diane Audeon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Kristen Stills
published
Jennifer Lerner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyse Gainor + Adele Slaughter121445% games+7.4% vs expected
Diane Audeon + Lupe Lopez6260% games+0.7% vs expected
Kathleen Foy-Asaro + Adele Slaughter7750% games−11.0% vs expected
Diane Audeon + Margery Teller21137% gamesnot enough data
Lupe Lopez + Margery Teller11169% gamesnot enough data
Lupe Lopez + Margie Englis6262% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Gaytan + Adele Slaughter1441% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Gaytan + Kathleen Foy-Asaro314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lupe Lopez
149W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Elyse Gainor
46W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Nicole Martino
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Teri McClure
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Arianne Rudes
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Christine Steele
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Michelle Parent
103W–137L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Vicki Weinstein
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Adele Slaughter
163W–167L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cindy Gaytan
67W–83L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Barbara Brabec
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Margery Teller
81W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Diane Audeon
48W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kristen Stills
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Jennifer Lerner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.