Teams

YMCA:Doherty:Shee

2023 NH Adult 65 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-29vs MTS: ConstantinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Doherty / Richard Beffa vs Richard King / James Constantin3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMike Pagliuca / Ben Bailey vs Robert Rougvie / Peter Podesta6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-22vs MTS: ConstantinLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Doherty / Bill Shee vs Richard Aseltine / Rod Lovely3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Scott / Andrew McMillan vs Robert Nabinger / Terry Gould1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Beffa / Ben Bailey vs James Constantin / Richard King1-6, 5-7
2023-06-17vs MTS: ConstantinLost 03
L#1 DoublesBill Shee / Andrew McMillan vs Richard Aseltine / Terry Gould1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPeter Scott / Mike Pagliuca vs Peter Podesta / Scott Rappeport3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBen Bailey / Richard Beffa vs Robert Nabinger / Robert Rougvie3-6, 2-6
2023-06-10vs MTS: ConstantinLost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Shee / David Doherty vs Richard Aseltine / Terry Gould6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Scott / Mike Pagliuca vs Peter Podesta / Scott Rappeport3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBen Bailey / Richard Beffa vs James Constantin / Daniel Snyder6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTS: Constantin04102463
2YMCA:Doherty:Shee0421022140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Peter Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Ben Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
David Doherty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Mike Pagliuca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew McMillan
published
Bill Shee
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Peter Breu
published
Richard Beffa
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Beffa + Ben Bailey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Scott
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Ben Bailey
36W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
David Doherty
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Pagliuca
8W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
Andrew McMillan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Bill Shee
6W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Breu
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Beffa
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.