Teams

2-LWollman-CHCC

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-04-11vs 1-MLong-Eno-40+ 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLee Wollman / Karen Armstrong vs Joyce Robinson / Kelly Travis1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-28vs 4-MIsrael-CHCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMyra Jester / Lee Wollman vs Kit Carson / Melissa Israel6-4, 7-5
2022-03-21vs 5-EEverett-HVCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLee Wollman / Julie Vozella vs Susan Peak / Margaret Smith6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Stacey Lange
published
2.95
2.58
Laurie Oakley
published
2.57
Karol Wenner
published
2.56
Judi Seagroves
published
2.56
Lee Wollman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Janis Tillman
published
2.39
Julie Vozella
published
Karen Armstrong
published
Lissa Jensen
published
Olga Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Vozella + Laurie Oakley3544% games−3.4% vs expected
Janis Tillman + Lee Wollman134 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Williamson + Stacey Lange224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Lange
24W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3
Carrie Williamson
31W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Laurie Oakley
6W–25L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Karol Wenner
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Judi Seagroves
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Lee Wollman
47W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.56
Janis Tillman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
Julie Vozella
6W–25L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.39
Karen Armstrong
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lissa Jensen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Olga Murphy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.