Teams

Bartz Mix It Up ES 7.0

2024 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 MX (FRI)

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesSarah Curfman / Barry Pinnock vs Beth Ann Sloan / Jov Tuplano6-2, 6-3
2023-12-01vs Fjelstad/TollefsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Carrell / Barry Pinnock vs Scott Lundquist / Jennifer Lewis7-6, 6-2
2023-11-17vs Kuna - Friday'sLost 01
L#3 DoublesBarry Pinnock / Nikki Fahey vs Dan Kuna / Luanne Kuna6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-10vs Johnson: Love SchmackedWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Bartz / Fazel Haris vs Jeffrey Nelson / Meredith Stromberg6-2, 6-4
2023-11-03vs Fermstad: LakeVillains MXLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Bartz / Charles Sunderland vs Jo Janssens / Catherine Hosamane3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-10-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Carrell / Barry Pinnock vs Paul Jackson / Lisa Penningroth3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Ramon Villanueva
published
3.57
Rachel Lund
published
3.49
Sarah Curfman
published
3.41
Kim Bartz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Charles Sunderland
published 3.5
3.22
Barry Pinnock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Fazel Haris
published
3.17
Beth Arel
published 3.5
3.10
Katie Wernet
published
3.10
Jodi Gallup
published
3.08
Gene Scow
published
Grace Held
published
Nikki Fahey
published
Rick Jerz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Arel + Charles Sunderland224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ramon Villanueva
38W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Rachel Lund
54W–46L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Sarah Curfman
58W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kim Bartz
117W–122L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Charles Sunderland
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Barry Pinnock
96W–92L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Fazel Haris
20W–24L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Beth Arel
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Katie Wernet
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jodi Gallup
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Gene Scow
16W–34L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Grace Held
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nikki Fahey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rick Jerz
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.