Teams

Harris/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-09vs Waide/Smith/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSamantha Feuer / Chasity O'Quinn vs Alyssa Maddox / Jamie Iverson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWindsor Wall vs Kim Huinker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Hone / Danae Bair vs Lesli Lowry / Meg Stratton7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-26vs Smead/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmilie Harris / Danae Bair vs Jodi St Charles / Angela Rae Rhody3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesWindsor Wall vs Rhonda Mann6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJackie Hone / Aubrey Vick vs Dawn Duke / Wyeshia Edwards2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-04vs Waide/Smith/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmilie Harris / Samantha Feuer vs Lesli Lowry / Meg Stratton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Hone / Aubrey Vick vs LeAnn Waide / Jamie Iverson7-6, 4-5
2026-03-21vs Smead/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesWindsor Wall / Fallon Parker Hutcheon vs Martha Filipkowski / Renee Trent6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSamantha Feuer vs Rhonda Mann4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChasity O'Quinn / Jackie Hone vs Dawn Duke / Lauren Goodman2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.43
Windsor Wall
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Aubrey Vick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Emilie Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Fallon Parker Hutcheon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Jackie Hone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Samantha Feuer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.95
Chasity O'Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aubrey Vick + Windsor Wall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Windsor Wall
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.43
2.5
Aubrey Vick
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Emilie Harris
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Fallon Parker Hutcheon
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Jackie Hone
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Samantha Feuer
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Chasity O'Quinn
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.