Teams

Fred Wells Sollenberger 10:30am

2025 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clay Sollenberger
published 4.5
3.47
Angel Chandler
published 3.5
3.44
Winnie Lynott
published
3.41
Susan Volin
published
3.40
Taia Morley
published
3.36
Sarah Muellenberg
published
3.33
Jeanne Elert
published
3.27
Jacqueline Kirk
published
3.26
Lauren Delaney
published
3.19
Mary Henke
published
3.16
Jane Newman
published
3.11
3.08
Suzanne Hermes
published
3.06
Jacqueline DeVries
published
3.02
Nancy Garrett
published
2.97
Paula Bach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angel Chandler + Lauren Delaney3254% games+4.9% vs expected
Susan Volin + Angel Chandler8458% games+4.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Kirk + Mary Henke5649% games+1.0% vs expected
Winnie Lynott + Taia Morley9557% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clay Sollenberger
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Angel Chandler
55W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Winnie Lynott
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Susan Volin
26W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Taia Morley
24W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Sarah Muellenberg
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Jeanne Elert
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Jacqueline Kirk
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Lauren Delaney
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Mary Henke
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jane Newman
7W–20L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Kristi Kamish-Bushinski
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Suzanne Hermes
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jacqueline DeVries
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Nancy Garrett
36W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Paula Bach
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.