Teams

6.0 PTC Pham X55S

2024 SPRING Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 55&O

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-03vs PHX/Hanson/55&O/6.0XDLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarry Gordon / Carol Thomas vs Janette Hanson / Joseph D'Agostino6-4, 4-3
L#2 DoublesBill Sciury / Katie Janssen vs Christy Granard / Leo Serrano6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAn Ly / Jennifer Williams vs ANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-03vs PHX/Hanson/55&O/6.0XDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Witsil / Tri Pham vs Deb DiCiccio / Manuel Villarreal0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie A Tieder / Bill Sciury vs Christy Granard / Leo Serrano6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPenny Springer / Mike Olson vs Janette Hanson / Joseph D'Agostino6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-02vs PHX/Hanson/55&O/6.0XDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie A Tieder / Bill Sciury vs Denise Echeverria / Manuel Villarreal6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Witsil / Mike Olson vs Deb DiCiccio / Atif Khan3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Janssen / Tri Pham vs ANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-02vs PHX/Hanson/55&O/6.0XDWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarry Gordon / Carol Thomas vs Denise Echeverria / Manuel Villarreal6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPenny Springer / Mike Olson vs Deb DiCiccio / Atif Khan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAn Ly / Jennifer Williams vs ANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Mixed 55&O
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/Hanson/55&O/6.0XD226615108
26.0 PTC Pham X55S226616117

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
An Ly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Bill Sciury
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Julie A Tieder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Barry Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Penny Springer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen Witsil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Katie Janssen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barry Gordon + Carol Thomas314 matchesnot enough data
Barry Gordon + Julie A Tieder303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Thomas
15W–46L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
An Ly
22W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Bill Sciury
54W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Julie A Tieder
33W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Barry Gordon
61W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Penny Springer
38W–88L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Kathleen Witsil
8W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Janssen
22W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.