Teams

Alexander/Memphis

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-22vs Thomas/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesOscar Carr / Stephanie Dent vs Dena Mullen / John Mullen3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Gleysteen / Shanna Eason vs Hunter Ivy / Lynn Davis7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSheila Carro / Clayton Eber vs Reagan Guess / Dana Deviney2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-15vs Cooper/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatie Carter / John Gleysteen vs Jennifer Magee / ROBERT LEBLANC6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Dent / Oscar Carr vs Xuezhong Li / Sydney Trumbo7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVirginia Burbank / Berkeley Burbank vs Katie Ansel / Peyton Neal3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
John Gleysteen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Catie Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Virginia Burbank
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Stephanie Dent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Lil Rudd
published
3.58
Nelli Golmeeva
published
3.55
Emily Koelsch
published
3.54
Oscar Carr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Shanna Eason
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Sheila Carro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Clayton Eber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Irwin Corpuz
published
3.27
Berkeley Burbank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Jess Flanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Kristen Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Manuel Carro
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Gleysteen
27W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Catie Carter
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Virginia Burbank
31W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Stephanie Dent
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Lil Rudd
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Nelli Golmeeva
22W–25L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Emily Koelsch
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Oscar Carr
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
Shanna Eason
49W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sheila Carro
24W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Clayton Eber
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Irwin Corpuz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Berkeley Burbank
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Jess Flanders
28W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Kristen Alexander
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.99
Manuel Carro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.