Teams

Las Grinches - Yarieli Medina

2025 Tri-Level 40&Over · Women's 40 & Over 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / PUERTO RICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs SchwartzWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Padial / Yarieli Medina-Claudio vs Jennifer Johnson / Raluca Parnell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesArleen Figueroa / Marisol Ramos vs Brooke Heckert / Lizbeth Febles Centeno0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLeida Quinones / Mildred Santiago vs Julia Schwartz / Katayoun Yaraghi-Josephs4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-12-12vs Rio Mar - ThyniaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Ortiz / Glendaly Arroyo Ortiz vs Joanny Lozada / Jennifer Bates7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAraceli Medina / Marisol Ramos vs Thynia Rivera / Sara Shikhman6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSorieliz Morales / Rita Bravo vs Monica Alonso / Maribel Gonzalez3-6, 3-6
2025-12-12vs Rio Mar - ThyniaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Ortiz / Yarieli Medina-Claudio vs Jennifer Bates / Thynia Rivera6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAraceli Medina / Marisol Ramos vs Sara Shikhman / Magaly Arocho3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMildred Santiago / Rita Bravo vs Monica Alonso / Maribel Gonzalez6-7, 0-6
2025-12-09vs Mariela VegaLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Padial / Karlabeth Padial vs Michelle Viguie / Monique Gracia6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAraceli Medina / Marisol Ramos vs Mariela Vega / Marie Rodriguez3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRita Bravo / Sorieliz Morales vs Marilyn Pietri / Jimmarie Bou3-6, 2-6
2025-12-07vs Mariela VegaLost 12
W#1 DoublesYarieli Medina-Claudio / Janet Ortiz vs Kay Bassi / Irmaris Pizarro6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarisol Ramos / Arleen Figueroa vs Jennifer Anderson / Veronne Bustos3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSorieliz Morales / Mildred Santiago vs Mayte Vivaldi / Yamile Alicea1-6, 1-6
2025-12-06vs SchwartzLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Padial / Karlabeth Padial vs Raluca Parnell / Jennifer Johnson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAraceli Medina / Arleen Figueroa vs Brooke Heckert / Denisse Jove0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLeida Quinones / Mildred Santiago vs Julia Schwartz / Danielle Vintfeld4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women's 40 & Over 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mariela Vega601537110
2Schwartz3381023162
3Las Grinches - Yarieli Medina2481023174
4Rio Mar - Thynia1551326192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Yarieli Medina-Claudio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Aurora Sotogras
published 4
3.73
Karlabeth Padial
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Elizabeth Padial
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Glendaly Arroyo Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.23
Melby Febus
published
3.19
Araceli Medina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Janet Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Arleen Figueroa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Marisol Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Leida Quinones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Mildred Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
2.52
Sorieliz Morales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Rita Bravo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Ortiz + Marisol Ramos6460% games+5.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Padial + Karlabeth Padial602159% games+2.4% vs expected
Araceli Medina + Alexandra Valentin5744% games−7.7% vs expected
Arleen Figueroa + Janet Ortiz3547% games−13.7% vs expected
Marisol Ramos + Araceli Medina1440% gamesnot enough data
Arleen Figueroa + Marisol Ramos044 matchesnot enough data
Sorieliz Morales + Rita Bravo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yarieli Medina-Claudio
25W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Aurora Sotogras
20W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Karlabeth Padial
78W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Elizabeth Padial
110W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Glendaly Arroyo Ortiz
83W–104L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Melby Febus
65W–25L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Araceli Medina
79W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Janet Ortiz
81W–101L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Arleen Figueroa
39W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Marisol Ramos
76W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Leida Quinones
21W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Mildred Santiago
64W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Alexandra Valentin
60W–48L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Sorieliz Morales
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Rita Bravo
26W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.