Teams

LA LLW The Volley Vamps - Millie Christie

2025 Adult 65 & Over · LA - Women 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-18vs LA - Bjorn To RunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeryl Mendelson / Crystal Alexander vs Beverly Gatica / Renae Jacobs6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNora Tu-Willis / Joyce Baron vs Raquelle de la Rocha / Patricia Lombard7-5, 2-3
2025-10-12vs LA - Bjorn To RunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeryl Mendelson / Crystal Alexander vs Judianne Jaffe / Michele Werdin6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJody Brockway / Cynthia Morrison vs Raquelle de la Rocha / Patricia Lombard6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-05vs LA - Bjorn To RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Branigan / Sarina Hakimian vs Patricia Lombard / Beverly Gatica6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-20vs LA - Bjorn To RunWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeryl Mendelson / Laura Branigan vs Michele Werdin / Beverly Gatica6-0, 6-0
2025-09-13vs LA - Bjorn To RunWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Branigan / Sarina Hakimian vs Diane Wagner / Raquelle de la Rocha6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Laura Branigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Mary ONeill
published
2.84
Millie Christie
published
Cynthia Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Nora Tu-Willis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Caroline Rook
published 3
2.68
Beryl Mendelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Crystal Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jody Brockway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joyce Baron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarina Hakimian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Alexander + Beryl Mendelson2453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laura Branigan
27W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Mary ONeill
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Millie Christie
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cynthia Morrison
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nora Tu-Willis
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Caroline Rook
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Beryl Mendelson
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Crystal Alexander
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Jody Brockway
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joyce Baron
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarina Hakimian
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.