Teams

Phan - All the Singles Ladies 3.5W

2024 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-12Won 10
W#3 SinglesColleen Knapp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-27vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Jennifer Coady6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Chengyin Wu3-6, 6-7
2024-10-26vs Klyap - SparkleWon 10
W#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Mary Klyap6-2, 6-4
2024-10-24vs Klyap - SparkleLost 01
L#2 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Briana Stine3-6, 6-7
2024-10-22vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Jennifer Coady3-6, 2-6
2024-10-16vs Klyap - SparkleWon 20
W#1 SinglesShrijoyee Ray vs Mary Klyap7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Rosalba Davis6-2, 7-5
2024-10-14vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Wenxi Li0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesShrijoyee Ray vs Sarah Lawrence4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Elizabeth Amerault3-6, 5-7
2024-10-12vs Klyap - SparkleLost 02
L#1 SinglesShrijoyee Ray vs Morgan Miller1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Lynn Gorman5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-04vs Chung - Rally Cats 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Sandy Thongphok3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNa Yi vs Sarah Lawrence2-6, 1-6
2024-09-16vs Klyap - SparkleWon 20
W#2 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Morgan Miller7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesColleen Knapp vs Rosalba Davis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jean Acuna
published
3.53
Na Yi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.50
Bari Abensohn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Shrijoyee Ray
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Vy Nguyen
published
Amy Flynn
published 3.5
3.20
Colleen Knapp
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3.5
2.59
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bari Abensohn + Na Yi314 matchesnot enough data
Cecilia-Hien Phan + Shrijoyee Ray224 matchesnot enough data
Na Yi + Shrijoyee Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jean Acuna
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Na Yi
198W–103L career · 1 line in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Bari Abensohn
96W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Shrijoyee Ray
125W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Vy Nguyen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Amy Flynn
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Colleen Knapp
71W–81L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Cecilia-Hien Phan
140W–186L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.