Teams

Zimmerer/Baker

2024 NETX Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 MIXED

8 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-29vs MartellWon 21
L#1 DoublesTroy Dorman / Lisa Losack vs Michael Sessions / Deesa Loving2-1
W#2 DoublesSamuel Baker / Kimberly Henry vs David Collings / Ann Skogerboe6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Zimmerer / Tonya Baker vs Charles Lusk / Snizhana Zhdanova6-2, 6-0
2024-09-29vs MartellLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamuel Baker / Kimberly Henry vs Michael Sessions / Snizhana Zhdanova6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Anderson / Lisa Losack vs Jimmy Williams / Lisa McCrary4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Stein / Stacy Cromer vs Bobby Howard / Ann Skogerboe6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-28vs MartellWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Anderson / Lisa Losack vs Charles Lusk / Lisa McCrary6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Zimmerer / Sherrie Lewis vs Jimmy Williams / Ann Skogerboe6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Stein / Kimberly Henry vs David Collings / Deesa Loving7-6, 6-4
2024-09-28vs MartellWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherrie Lewis / Matthew Zimmerer vs Deesa Loving / Charles Lusk6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSamuel Baker / Lisa Losack vs Lisa McCrary / Jimmy Williams4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Stein / Stacy Cromer vs Bobby Howard / Snizhana Zhdanova7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Matthew Zimmerer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Kimberly Henry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Stacy Cromer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Sherrie Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Lisa Losack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jeffrey Stein
published
Tonya Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Troy Dorman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Zimmerer
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Kimberly Henry
24W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Stacy Cromer
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Sherrie Lewis
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Lisa Losack
41W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jeffrey Stein
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tonya Baker
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Troy Dorman
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.